Why Did Frege Abandon the Metalinguistic Solution
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21550403 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Huiming Ren (0009-0009-3997-0892, Institute of Mind and Cognition, Shandong University (Qingdao) of China, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 169-182 |
| Publication date | 2023-09-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophical Papers (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0556-8641 • E-ISSN: 1996-8523 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/05568641.2024.2414250 |
| OpenAlex | W4404780700 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
The ongoing debate about whether Frege has ever abandoned the metalinguistic solution to Frege’s Puzzle not only is important by itself, but has serious ramifications. In this article, I show that Frege did abandon the metalinguistic solution and his objection to it is as follows. Though the co-reference relation between two signs is mediated by the connection of each of the two signs with the same designated thing, the connection is nevertheless arbitrary because it could be established even if one of the two signs is distinguished from the other only as object not as sign. As a result, if by “a = b” we assert a co-reference relation, we would express no proper knowledge
Epistemology · Linguistics · Principle of compositionality · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Philosophy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|