Why do people believe in a just world

Testing explanations

Bibliographic Data

ID2155154
AuthorsD E Benson (0000-0001-9817-1323, Kent State University, corresponding author)
Year1992
Volume12
Issue1
Pages73-104
Publication date1992-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociological Spectrum (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0273-2173 • E-ISSN: 1521-0707
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02732173.1992.9981988
OpenAlexW2069012380
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited42

From the literature, three explanations for a belief that the world is a “just place” are presented: (V high religiosity, (2) being “naive” about the world, and (3) successful acquisition of societal rewards. Pertinent literature for each explanation is examined and the results are found to be both mixed and contradictory. Using a random sample of adults (N = 283) from Northern Ireland, all three explanations are tested with multiple indicators using a revised version of the Rubin and Peplau (1975) Just World scale. Religiosity is not found to be related to the “just world” phenomenon, and the support for the other two explanations is mixed and gender‐related. Finding the extant explanations for a belief in a just world to be inadequate, brief suggestions for a new explanation and further research are discussed

Epistemology · Extant taxon · Geography · Just-world hypothesis · Phenomenon · Religiosity · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub