Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Artificial Intelligence and Musicking

Bibliographic Data

ID21557303
AuthorsAdam Eric Berkowitz (0000-0001-8340-4745, Broward County Library, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume41
Issue5
Pages393-412
Publication date2024-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMusic Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0730-7829 • E-ISSN: 1533-8312
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/mp.2024.41.5.393
OpenAlexW4396985884
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited28

Artificial intelligence (AI) deployed for customer relationship management (CRM), digital rights management (DRM), content recommendation, and content generation challenge longstanding truths about listening to and making music. CRM uses music to surveil audiences, removes decision-making responsibilities from consumers, and alters relationships among listeners, artists, and music. DRM overprotects copyrighted content by subverting Fair Use Doctrine and privatizing the Public Domain thereby restricting human creativity. Generative AI, often trained on music misappropriated by developers, renders novel music that seemingly represents neither the artistry present in the training data nor the handiwork of the AI’s user. AI music, as such, appears to be produced through AI cognition, resulting in what some have called “machine folk” and contributing to a “culture in code.” A philosophical analysis of these relationships is required to fully understand how AI impacts music, artists, and audiences. Using metasynthesis and grounded theory, this study considers physical reductionism, metaphysical nihilism, existentialism, and modernity to describe the quiddity of AI’s role in the music ecosystem. Concluding thoughts call researchers and educators to act on philosophical and ethical discussions of AI and promote continued research, public education, and democratic/laymen intervention to ensure ethical outcomes in the AI music space

Aesthetics · Art · Music and emotion · Music education · Music history · Pedagogy · Sociology · Computer Science · Diverse Musicological Studies · Music and Audio Processing · Music Technology and Sound Studies · Psychology

  • Circle of sound

    Open Access•Hendra Budiawan, Rizky Fauzy Ananda et al.•Cogent Arts and Humanities•2025

  • Digital Sweat from the Virtual Brow

    Open Access•Adam Eric Berkowitz•Philosophy & Technology•2025

  • What is Philosophy?

    Open Access•Graham Priest•Philosophy•2006

  • Copyright, compensation, and commons in the music AI industry

    Eric Drott•Creative Industries Journal•2021

  • The Long History of the 2017 Spotify “Fake Music” Scandal

    K E Goldschmitt•American Music•2020

  • Fake Streams, Listening Bots, and Click Farms

    Eric Drott•American Music•2020

  • From creator to data

    Open Access•K Negus•Media Culture & Society•2019

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae