Examining the Double-Edged Sword Effects of Lay Theories of Mental Health on Perceptions and Treatment of Others with Mental Health Problems
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21559243 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emily M Erb, Michael A Busseri (0000-0001-8110-8213, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 299-325 |
| Publication date | 2022-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0736-7236 • E-ISSN: 1943-2771 |
| Publisher | Guilford Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1521/jscp.2022.41.4.299 |
| OpenAlex | W4289318096 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 36 |
INTRODUCTION: We examined the implications of viewing mental health problems as changeable through personal effort (incremental lay theory), fixed due to genetics (entity lay theory), or manageable through perseverance on perceptions of others with mental health problems. METHOD: In two preregistered studies, samples of online American participants were randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions: manageable, incremental (changeable), entity (fixed), or control, and completed self-report measures of onset responsibility, offset efficacy, blame, stigma, willingness to help, and perceived likelihood of success of interventions aimed at helping those with mental health problems. RESULTS: In both studies, the manipulation had a significant effect on each outcome except willingness to help. Compared to the entity (fixed) condition, individuals in the incremental (changeable) condition reported significantly higher offset efficacy and perceived likelihood of success, but also higher onset responsibility and blame. Results for the manageable condition were similar to the incremental (changeable) condition but individuals in the manageable condition also reported lower responsibility (Study 1) as well as lower blame and stigma (Study 2). DISCUSSION: This work informs the ‘double-edged sword’ effects of holding incremental (changeable) or entity (fixed) lay theories concerning mental health problems. Findings also provide evidence that viewing mental health problems as manageable may reduce some of the negative and boost the positive implications associated with incremental (changeable) and entity (fixed) lay theories
Blame · Developmental psychology · Mental health · Perception · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Psychotherapist · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Clinical Psychology · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Biogenetic Explanations of Mental Disorder
The ‘side effects’ of medicalization
“It is what one does”
Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research
TurkPrime.com
Social Learning Theory and the Health Belief Model
Growth Mindset Messaging in Stigma-Relevant Contexts
Is your health malleable or fixed? The influence of implicit theories on health-related attitudes and behaviour
Evaluating the Domain Specificity of Mental Health–Related Mind-Sets
The obesity stigma asymmetry model
Do Growth Mindsets in Math Benefit Females? Identifying Pathways between Gender, Mindset, and Motivation
When and why is helping others good for well‐being? The role of belief in reciprocity and conformity to society's expectations
The pitfall of experimenting on the web
Prejudice against fat people
Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgments and Reactions
A Modified Labeling Theory Approach to Mental Disorders
Culpable control and the psychology of blame
Lay theories of health, self-rated health, and health behavior intentions
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |