Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Disabled Youth Transitioning from Care

An International Policy Analysis

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21559643
AutoresBerni Kelly (0000-0002-4204-6694, Queen's University Belfast, autor de correspondencia), Gilbert Gimm (0000-0001-6361-6951, George Mason University), Oterholm Inger (VID Specialized University), Jemma Venables (0000-0002-3783-1639, The University of Queensland), Claire Baker (0000-0001-9729-6087, Coram), Ingri-Hanne Braenne Bennwik, Ingri‐Hanne Brænne Bennwik (0000-0002-0489-2339, VID Specialized University), Kathy Ellem (0000-0003-2074-9724, The University of Queensland), Joann S Lee (0000-0002-5405-910X, University at Buffalo, State University of New York), Leah P Cheatham (0000-0003-4066-615X, University of Alabama)
Año2026
Volumen43
Número2
Páginas495-510
Fecha de publicación2026-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaChild and Adolescent Social Work Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0738-0151 • E-ISSN: 1573-2797
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10560-025-01061-7
OpenAlexW4416539077
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas38

Many countries across the globe have enacted leaving care policy to make provision for transition planning and aftercare support for care-leavers who face significant challenges in adulthood. However, the extent to which care-leaver policy addresses the unique needs of disabled youth leaving care is not known. This paper seeks to address this gap in knowledge by analysing care-leaver policy in four countries (United States, United Kingdom, Norway and Australia) with a specific focus on how well they address disability issues. A key finding is the lack of consistency in the explicit recognition of disabled youth in care-leaving policy and an absence of directives to guide the adaptation and implementation of policy for disabled care-leavers. There is also a fragmentation in aftercare support with an increasing individualist approach grounded in normative assumptions for independent adulthood and a medical model of disability with a parallel retraction or redirection of formal regulation that impacts on disabled youth transitions from care. The paper concludes with recommendations for developing policy to give greater recognition to the needs of disabled care-leavers and their non-normative pathways from care into adulthood that require a refocus on interdependence, youth voice, extended aftercare support and collaborative services

Disabled people · Globe · Health care · Individualism · Normative · Policy analysis · Social policy · Child Welfare and Adoption · Family Support in Illness · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics · Health Policy

  • ‘I still can’t really leave this place’

    Open Access•Shian Yin•Disability & Society•2026

  • Disability counts

    Open Access•Leah P Cheatham, Claire Baker et al.•International Journal of Social…•2026

  • Assessing Homelessness and Incarceration Among Youth Aging Out of Foster Care, by Type of Disability

    Open Access•Joann S Lee, Gilbert Gimm et al.•Child and Adolescent Social Work…•2023

  • Experiences of Children and Young People with a Disability in Out‐of‐Home Care in Australia

    Open Access•Kathomi Gatwiri, Lynne Mcpherson et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2024

  • Barriers and facilitators to healthcare access among youth transitioning out of foster care

    Open Access•Natalia L Smith, Alauna Adams et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2025

  • Working Individually and Collectively

    Open Access•Jemma Venables, Kathy Ellem et al.•Journal of Applied Youth Studies•2024

  • I got into a very dark place”

    Open Access•Berni Kelly, Colm Walsh et al.•Journal of Children s Services•2021

  • How do academic and career services affect employment, education, and disability benefit receipt in the transition to adulthood for youth with disabilities who have aged out of foster care

    Erin J Mccauley•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2022

  • Comparing Leaving-Care Policy and Practice Across the Four Nations of the United Kingdom

    Emily R Munro, Berni Kelly et al.•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2024

  • Beyond populism and into the state

    Open Access•Görkem Altınörs, Angelos Chryssogelos•The British Journal of Politics…•2024

  • Social Work and the political conflict in Northern Ireland

    Jim Campbell, John Pinkerton et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2024

  • Policy values related to support for care leavers with disabilities

    Ingri‐Hanne Brænne Bennwik, Inger Oterholm•European Journal of Social Work•2020

  • Moving from ‘what we know works’ to ‘what we do in practice’

    Open Access•Hayley Alderson, Deborah Smart et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2023

  • Disability is not a word we use’

    Open Access•Ingri‐Hanne Brænne Bennwik, Inger Oterholm et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2022

  • Ending Australia’s Status as a “Leaving Care Laggard”

    Philip Mendes•Australian Social Work•2021

  • Service coordination for transition-age foster youth with disabilities

    Open Access•Judy Havlicek, Lucy Bilaver•Children and Youth Services Review•2021

  • Youth with disabilities transitioning from foster care

    Open Access•Leah P Cheatham, Karen A Randolph et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2020

  • Differential risks

    Open Access•Erin J Mccauley, Erin McCauley•Children and Youth Services Review•2021

  • The needs and experiences of young people with a disability transitioning from out-of-home care

    Open Access•Philip Mendes, P Snow•Children and Youth Services Review•2014

  • Raising the profile of care leavers with mental health and/or intellectual disabilities

    Open Access•Berni Kelly, Paul Webb et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2022

  • Youth with disabilities in the United States Child Welfare System

    Open Access•Elspeth Slayter•Children and Youth Services Review•2016

  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) young people leaving out-of-home care in Australia

    Open Access•Philip Mendes, Rachel Standfield et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2021

  • A comparative study of child welfare systems

    Open Access•Neil Gilbert•Children and Youth Services Review•2012

  • My disability was my own responsibility’

    Open Access•Ingri-Hanne Braenne Bennwik, Ingri‐Hanne Brænne Bennwik et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2023

  • The most significant child welfare reform in a generation”

    Open Access•Philip Mendes•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2024

  • Disabled Children's Experience of Permanency in the Looked After System

    Claire Baker•The British Journal of Social Work•2006

  • Attention to disability in child protection policies across four liberal welfare regimes

    Open Access•Lisa Johnson, Suzanne Flynn et al.•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2024

  • Indigenous young people transitioning from alternative care in Australia

    Open Access•Joseph J Mcdowall, Katherine Creed et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2025

  • The Introduction of Extended Out‐of‐Home Care (Oohc) Until 21 Years in Australia

    Open Access•Philip Mendes, Steven Roche et al.•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2025

  • A multinational comparison of care-leaving policy and legislation

    Open Access•Benjamin Strahl, Adrian D Van Breda et al.•Journal of International and…•2020

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año2
Intervalo de citas2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae