Agreement attraction in grammatical sentences and the role of the task
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21565124 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anna Laurinavichyute (0000-0002-3150-0206, University of Potsdam, corresponding author), Titus von der Malsburg (0000-0001-5925-5145, University of Stuttgart) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 137 |
| Pages | 104525 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Memory and Language (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0749-596X • E-ISSN: 1096-0821 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104525 |
| OpenAlex | W4393124641 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 58 |
This study evaluates two broad classes of language processing accounts that make predictions for sentences like “The admirer of the singer(s) apparently thinks...”. Feature distortion accounts predict increased processing difficulty at the verb in sentences with a plural distractor noun (singers) while similarity-based interference accounts predict the opposite: increased difficulty in sentences with a singular distractor noun (singer). Neither of these effects was reliably observed in earlier research, and the Bayesian meta-analysis of 31 published studies reported here is almost perfectly inconclusive. An explanation may be that both effects occur simultaneously and therefore mask each other. To test this idea, we conducted three single-trial self-paced reading experiments (N1=4,296, N2=3,920, N3=3,559) which orthogonally manipulated agreement attraction and inhibitory interference. Surprisingly, all three experiments produced evidence for agreement attraction but none for inhibitory interference, which supports feature distortion but not similarity-based interference accounts. Experiment 4 (N4=3,535) tested the role of the expected task by preparing participants for a comprehension question (vs. acceptability judgment in Experiments 1–3). It showed neither agreement attraction nor inhibitory interference effects. Our findings demonstrate that agreement attraction effects can arise in grammatical sentences – contra earlier research – but also that these effects crucially depend on the task. This explains inconsistent results in prior research and supports feature distortion as the driving force behind attraction effects in grammatical sentences
Agreement · Attraction · Cognitive psychology · Linguistics · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Learning or Boredom? Task Adaptation Effects in Sentence Processing Experiments
The discursive function of additives in interaction
Illusions of Plausibility
The time course of local coherence effects in German
BLiMP-NL
Alternative agreement in Danish—mismatch without intervention
Representation distortion contributes to agreement attraction in comprehension
Domain-specificity and the development of syntactic dependencies
Only case-syncretic nouns attract
Similarity-based interference in the processing of classifier-noun dependencies in Mandarin Chinese
Do local coherence effects exist in English reduced relative clauses
Stan
Making Syntax of Sense
Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension
Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension
An Activation‐Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval
Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension
Agreement attraction in comprehension
Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension
Ggplot2
Meaning, sound and syntax in english number agreement
Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension
BRMS
The Reading Signatures of Agreement Attraction
Analysis of rating scales
With Bayesian estimation one can get all that Bayes factors offer, and more
Maze Made Easy
Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited
Number feature distortion modulates cue-based retrieval in reading
Crosslinguistic evidence against interference from extra-sentential distractors
Does case marking affect agreement attraction in comprehension
Variability in sentence comprehension in aphasia in German
Encoding interference effects support self-organized sentence processing
Analyzing ordinal data with metric models
Act
Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures
Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |