Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Agreement attraction in grammatical sentences and the role of the task

Bibliographic Data

ID21565124
AuthorsAnna Laurinavichyute (0000-0002-3150-0206, University of Potsdam, corresponding author), Titus von der Malsburg (0000-0001-5925-5145, University of Stuttgart)
Year2024
Volume137
Pages104525
Publication date2024-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Memory and Language (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0749-596X • E-ISSN: 1096-0821
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.jml.2024.104525
OpenAlexW4393124641
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited58

This study evaluates two broad classes of language processing accounts that make predictions for sentences like “The admirer of the singer(s) apparently thinks...”. Feature distortion accounts predict increased processing difficulty at the verb in sentences with a plural distractor noun (singers) while similarity-based interference accounts predict the opposite: increased difficulty in sentences with a singular distractor noun (singer). Neither of these effects was reliably observed in earlier research, and the Bayesian meta-analysis of 31 published studies reported here is almost perfectly inconclusive. An explanation may be that both effects occur simultaneously and therefore mask each other. To test this idea, we conducted three single-trial self-paced reading experiments (N1=4,296, N2=3,920, N3=3,559) which orthogonally manipulated agreement attraction and inhibitory interference. Surprisingly, all three experiments produced evidence for agreement attraction but none for inhibitory interference, which supports feature distortion but not similarity-based interference accounts. Experiment 4 (N4=3,535) tested the role of the expected task by preparing participants for a comprehension question (vs. acceptability judgment in Experiments 1–3). It showed neither agreement attraction nor inhibitory interference effects. Our findings demonstrate that agreement attraction effects can arise in grammatical sentences – contra earlier research – but also that these effects crucially depend on the task. This explains inconsistent results in prior research and supports feature distortion as the driving force behind attraction effects in grammatical sentences

Agreement · Attraction · Cognitive psychology · Linguistics · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Learning or Boredom? Task Adaptation Effects in Sentence Processing Experiments

    Open Access•Jan Chromý, Fabian Tomaschek•Open MIND•2024

  • The discursive function of additives in interaction

    Open Access•Alexandra Lorson, Hannah Rohde et al.•Glossa a journal of general…•2024

  • Illusions of Plausibility

    Open Access•Lucas Cruz, Chiara Melloni et al.•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2026

  • The time course of local coherence effects in German

    Open Access•Pia Schoknecht, Dario Paape et al.•Cognitive Psychology•2026

  • BLiMP-NL

    Open Access•Michelle Suijkerbuijk, Zoë Prins et al.•Computational Linguistics•2025

  • Alternative agreement in Danish—mismatch without intervention

    Open Access•Ken Ramshøj Christensen, Anne Mette Nyvad•Frontiers in Language Sciences•2025

  • Representation distortion contributes to agreement attraction in comprehension

    Open Access•Maayan Keshev, Mandy Cartner et al.•Frontiers in Language Sciences•2026

  • Domain-specificity and the development of syntactic dependencies

    Open Access•Jean Gerard, Dana Mcdaniel•Journal of Memory and Language•2025

  • Only case-syncretic nouns attract

    Open Access•Radim Lacina, Anna Laurinavichyute et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2025

  • Similarity-based interference in the processing of classifier-noun dependencies in Mandarin Chinese

    Open Access•Hailin Hao, Zuzanna Fuchs et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2025

  • Do local coherence effects exist in English reduced relative clauses

    Open Access•Dario Paape, Garrett Smith et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2025

  • Stan

    Open Access•Bob Carpenter, Andrew Gelman et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • Making Syntax of Sense

    Kathleen M Eberhard, J Cooper Cutting et al.•Psychological Review•2005

  • Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension

    Open Access•Alex B Fine, T Florian Jaeger et al.•PLoS ONE•2013

  • Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension

    Open Access•Lena A Jäger, FELIX ENGELMANN et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2017

  • An Activation‐Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval

    Open Access•Richard L Lewis, Shravan Vasishth•Cognitive Science•2005

  • Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension

    Open Access•Richard L Lewis, Shravan Vasishth et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2006

  • Agreement attraction in comprehension

    Open Access•Matthew W Wagers, Ellen Lau et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2009

  • Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension

    Open Access•Julie A Van Dyke, Brian Mcelree•Journal of Memory and Language•2006

  • Ggplot2

    Open Access•Cedric Ginestet, Cedric E Ginestet•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•2011

  • Meaning, sound and syntax in english number agreement

    Kathryn Bock, Kathleen M Eberhard•Language and Cognitive Processes•1993

  • Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension

    Open Access•Neal J Pearlmutter, Susan M Garnsey et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•1999

  • BRMS

    Open Access•Paul-Christian Bürkner•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • The Reading Signatures of Agreement Attraction

    Open Access•Silvia Lago, C Farina et al.•Open MIND•2021

  • Analysis of rating scales

    Open Access•João Veríssimo•Bilingualism Language and Cognition•2021

  • With Bayesian estimation one can get all that Bayes factors offer, and more

    Open Access•Jorge Tendeiro, Henk A L Kiers•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2023

  • Maze Made Easy

    Open Access•Veronica Boyce, Richard Futrell et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2020

  • Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited

    Open Access•Lena A Jäger, Daniela Mertzen et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2020

  • Number feature distortion modulates cue-based retrieval in reading

    Open Access•Himanshu Yadav, Garrett Smith et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2023

  • Crosslinguistic evidence against interference from extra-sentential distractors

    Open Access•Daniela Mertzen, Anna Laurinavichyute et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2024

  • Does case marking affect agreement attraction in comprehension

    Open Access•Serine Avetisyan, Silvia Lago et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2020

  • Variability in sentence comprehension in aphasia in German

    Open Access•Dorothea Pregla, Paula Lissón et al.•Brain and Language•2021

  • Encoding interference effects support self-organized sentence processing

    Open Access•Garrett Smith, Julie Franck et al.•Cognitive Psychology•2021

  • Analyzing ordinal data with metric models

    Open Access•Torrin M Liddell, John K Kruschke•Journal of Experimental Social…•2018

  • Act

    Jared R Anderson, John R Anderson•American Psychologist•1996

  • Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures

    Open Access•Brian Mcelree•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2000

  • Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences

    Open Access•Shravan Vasishth, Bruno Nicenboim et al.•Journal of Phonetics•2018

Unique citing works11
Citations per year5,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae