Rhetorical distinctions
Comparing metadiscourse in essays by ChatGPT and students
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21580331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Feng Jiang (0000-0001-7369-9498, Beihang University, corresponding author), K Hyland (0000-0002-4727-8355, University of East Anglia) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 79 |
| Pages | 17-29 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | English for Specific Purposes (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0889-4906 • E-ISSN: 1873-1937 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.esp.2025.03.001 |
| OpenAlex | W4408995547 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 26 |
| References cited | 28 |
Linguistics · Metadiscourse · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Philosophy · Psychology · Text Readability and Simplification · Topic Modeling
Generative AI and the emergence of hybrid authorship in ESP writing
“It Tends to Remove Things I Originally Wanted to Emphasize”
The University in the World of Spiritual Pursuits Amid Technological Interventions
Rethinking AI in Writing Pedagogy
A systematic review of AI-assisted academic writing
Move patterns, metadiscourse use, and move-metadiscourse connection in ChatGPT-generated and human-written research article abstracts
Academic Writing in the Age of AI
Writing in the AI era
Interactional metadiscourse in student and professional business correspondence writing
Can AI mirror the human voice? Stance in scholar-written and ChatGPT-generated medical abstracts
Metapragmatic acts performed by ChatGPT 4o and human authors in research article (RA) abstracts
Does ChatGPT Write Like a Student? Engagement Markers in Argumentative Essays
Comparing lexical complexity differences between ChatGPT-generated and human-written medical abstracts
Shh…is silence really golden? A multivariate analysis of subjectivity in academic writings and translations
Engagement strategies in human-written and AI-generated academic essays
Generative AI in academic writing
Rhetorical divergence of AI
Towards Rigorous Corpus‐Based AI–Human Text Comparisons
Too Much of One Thing, Too Little of Another? Comparing Cohesive Networks Between Humans and ChatGPT in Academic Writings and Translations
Rhetorical shifts in the AI age
Exemplification in ChatGPT and student argumentative writing
Rhetorical evolution in mathematical modelling
From human to GenAI evaluations
EFL teachers and feedback fatigue
Metadiscursive nouns in academic argument
A Meta-Autoethnography of Metadiscourse
Bringing in the Reader
Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms
Metadiscourse
“In this paper we suggest”
“We must conclude that…”
Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing
A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays
Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?
Does ChatGPT Argue Like Students? Bundles in Argumentative Essays
Applying a Gloss
Metadiscourse choices in EAP
Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision
The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education
Dense and Disconnected
Text-organizing metadiscourse
Developing multilingual writing
Genres across the Disciplines
Corpus Approaches to Evaluation
Metadiscourse
| Unique citing works | 26 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 26 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 26 |