Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Romanian plăcea ‘like’

An alternating Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verb

Bibliographic Data

ID21583418
AuthorsMihaela Ilioaia (0000-0001-5753-9566, Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium), Marleen Van Peteghem (0000-0002-3444-6428, Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium), Jóhanna Barðdal (0000-0003-0164-4249, Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium)
Year2025
Publication date2025-07-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueProbus (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0921-4771 • E-ISSN: 1613-4079
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/probus-2025-0009
OpenAlexW4412384841
LanguageEN
References cited57

In several Indo-European languages, including Romanian, predicates such as plăcea ‘like’ from Latin placēre ‘like, please’, are found selecting for a dative experiencer and a nominative stimulus, which appear to allow for two opposite, but equally neutral, word orders, i.e. dative-before-nominative and nominative-before-dative. This stands in stark contrast with topicalized datives, which are always focal in Romanian. We hypothesize that the two word orders with plăcea represent two diametrically-opposed argument structures, Dat-Nom and Nom-Dat, thus predicting that the dative behaves syntactically as a subject in Dat-Nom structures and the nominative as a subject in Nom-Dat structures. An inspection of seven subject tests, recently applied in the literature on Romanian, reveals that two of these do not distinguish between subjects and objects, while the remaining five confirm that either argument of plăcea , the dative or the nominative, passes the subject tests, with the other argument, the nominative or the dative, behaving as an object

Linguistics · Romanian · Verb · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • The Syntax of Romanian

    Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen Dobrovie‐sorin•Syntax of Romanian•1994

  • Toward a Cartography of Subject Positions

    Anna Cardinaletti•The structure of CP and IP•2004

  • Icelandic non-nominative subjects

    Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann Sigur∂sson•Typological Studies in Language•2004

  • Oblique Subjects in Germanic

    Jóhanna Barðdal•Oblique Subjects in Germanic•2023

  • ‘Hungering and Lusting for Women and Fleshly Delicacies’

    Open Access•Jóhanna Barðdal, Thorhallur Eythorsson et al.•Transactions of the Philological…•2012

  • On Experiencers

    Open Access•Elena Anagnostopoulou•Studies in Greek Syntax•1999

  • Raising

    Open Access•Johan Van Der Auwera, Johan Van Der Van Der Auwera et al.•Journal of Germanic Linguistics•2011

  • Old Icelandic

    Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson•NOWELE. North-Western European…•1995

  • Dative experiencers with nominal predicates in Romanian

    Mihaela Ilioaia, Marleen Van Peteghem•Folia Linguistica•2021

  • Non-nominative subjects in Latin and Ancient Greek

    Open Access•Jóhanna Barðdal, Eleonora Cattafi et al.•Indogermanische Forschungen•2023

  • The alternating predicate puzzle

    Jóhanna Barðdal, Thorhallur Eythorsson et al.•Constructions and Frames•2019

  • The Perplexity of Dat-Nom Verbs in Icelandic

    Open Access•Jóhanna Barðdal•Nordic Journal of Linguistics•2001

  • Argument structure constructions in competition

    Open Access•Joren Somers, Gard B Jenset et al.•Nordic Journal of Linguistics•2026

  • PRO and null Case in finite clauses

    Arhonto Terzi•The Linguistic Review•1997

  • Subject and Object Control

    Open Access•Bernard Comrie•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•1984

  • Latin placēre ‘like, please’ as an alternating Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verb

    Brian Cluyse, Joren Somers et al.•Indogermanische Forschungen•2025

  • Where does the modality of Ancient Greek modal verbs come from

    Open Access•Serena Danesi, Johnson Johnson et al.•Journal of Greek Linguistics•2018

  • Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German

    Open Access•Jóhanna Barðdal•Cognitive Linguistics•2006

  • The Object Agreement Constraint

    Open Access•Javier Ormazabal, Juan Romero•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2007

  • Intensionality, high applicatives, and aspect

    Open Access•Maria-Luisa Rivero, María Luisa Rivero•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2009

  • What Does It Take To Be A Dative Subject

    Open Access•John C Moore, John Moore et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2000

  • Subjecthood and argument structure of synonymous Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat verbs across German and Icelandic

    Open Access•Joren Somers, Gard B Jenset et al.•Lingua•2024

  • The change that never happened

    Open Access•Jóhanna Barðdal, Thorhallur Eythorsson et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2003

  • Control in Generative Grammar

    Open Access•Idan Landau•Control in Generative Grammar•2013

  • Radical Construction Grammar

    William Croft•Radical Construction Grammar•2001

  • Sujeito dativo em Canela

    Open Access•Flávia De Castro Alves•Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio…•2018

  • Bengali dative subjects

    Open Access•M H Klaiman•Lingua•1980

  • Oblique Subjects

    Open Access•Thorhallur Eythorsson, Þórhallur Eyþórsson et al.•Language•2005

  • The Acquisition of Subjecthood

    Peter Cole, Wayne Harbert et al.•Language•1980

  • Object markers and agreement pronouns in Semitic languages

    Open Access•G A Khan, Geoffrey Khan•Bulletin of the School of…•1984

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae