Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is the UK Supreme Court rogue to un-prorogue Parliament

Bibliographic Data

ID21586493
AuthorsConstantina P Tridimas (BPP University), George Tridimas (0000-0002-3182-0322, University of Ulster, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume49
Issue2
Pages205-225
Publication date2020-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Law and Economics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0929-1261 • E-ISSN: 1572-9990
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10657-020-09647-5
OpenAlexW3015311919
LanguageEN
References cited30

On 24 September 2019, in a unanimous judgment the UK Supreme Court ([2019] UKSC 41) ruled that the Prime Minister’s action to prorogue (suspend) Parliament for 5 weeks in the run-up to the 31-10-2019 deadline of the UK leaving the European Union, was unlawful and of no effect, as it prevented Parliament from carrying out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification. Although the Court did not pronounce on the merits and demerits of Brexit, its decision delighted “Remainers” but appalled “Leavers”. The Court ruling epitomises the potency of constitutional review by an independent judiciary. The paper applies collective choice theory to analyse the ruling of the Supreme Court. This is accomplished by (a) examining the legal basis of the Court ruling; (b) reviewing arguments for judicial review and (c) exploring the effect of the Court as an additional player in the game of collective choice in a spatial decision model

Constitution · Constitutional court · Constitutional review · Law and economics · Majority opinion · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Legal principles and applications

  • On Law, Politics, and Judicialization

    Martin Shapiro, Alec Stone Sweet•On Law, Politics, and Judicializati…•2002

  • Economic growth and judicial independence

    Open Access•Lars P Feld, Stefan Voigt•European Journal of Political…•2003

  • The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts

    Open Access•J Mark Ramseyer•The Journal of Legal Studies•1994

  • The Politician and the Judge

    Eric Maskin, Jean Tirole•American Economic Review•2004

  • The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth

    Open Access•Witold J Henisz•Economics and Politics•2000

  • A positive theory of statutory interpretation

    Open Access•John Ferejohn, John A Ferejohn et al.•International Review of Law and…•1992

  • The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective

    William M Landes, Richard A Posner•The Journal of Law and Economics•1975

  • Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law

    Open Access•John Ferejohn•Law and Contemporary Problems•2002

  • Veto Players

    George Tsebelis•Veto Players•2002

  • Constitutional and Administrative Law

    Hilaire Barnett•Constitutional and Administrative…•2004

  • Judges and Taxes

    Open Access•George Tridmas•Constitutional Political Economy•2005

  • Legislative-Judicial Relations

    Georg Vanberg•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Information and Judicial Review

    James R Rogers•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Judicial Checks and Balances

    Rafael La Porta, Florencio López‐de‐silane et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2004

  • Constitutional Courts and Parliamentary Democracy

    Alec Stone Sweet•West European Politics•2002

  • Two Logics of Delegation

    Open Access•Giandomenico Majone•European Union Politics•2001

  • The Norm of Stare Decisis

    Jack Knight, Lee Epstein•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • "Who Watches the Watchmen?" A Comparative Study on Judicial Responsibility

    Mauro Cappelletti•The American Journal of…•1983

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae