Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Folk metaethics and error

Bibliographic Data

ID21592292
AuthorsXinkan Zhao (0000-0002-9123-7921, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume37
Issue8
Pages2262-2284
Publication date2024-11-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophical Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0951-5089 • E-ISSN: 1465-394X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09515089.2022.2139231
OpenAlexW4307386232
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited53

Philosophers have in recent years displayed an increasing interest in investigating folk metaethical beliefs using rigorous empirical methods. Taken together, these studies put significant pressure on many philosophical theories that depend on the truth of folk moral objectivism, the view that the folk see morality as objectively grounded. Frequently included among the target of criticism is Mackie’s error theory, or more specifically the conceptual claim thereof. Finding this criticism misplaced, Benjamin Fraser tries to exonerate error theory from such accusation by distinguishing different senses of objectivity. In this paper, I show why Fraser’s strategy is not successful so that the pressure empirically brought upon classical error theory is genuine. However, I also argue that even on the new picture suggested by experimental studies, the folk still entertain erroneous beliefs, which, when coupled with plausible metasemantic assumptions and further empirical support, should warrant an error theory after all, though not in its classical form

Criticism · Epistemology · False accusation · Folk psychology · Morality · Objectivism · Warrant · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Signaling (in)tolerance

    Open Access•David A Mo, David Moss et al.•Cognition•2025

  • The normativity objection and the coloring strategy

    Open Access•Xinkan Zhao•Synthese•2024

  • Ethics

    J L Mackie•Ethics•1977

  • Unbelievable Errors

    Bart Streumer•Unbelievable Errors•2017

  • The Normative Web

    Terence Cuneo•The Normative Web•2007

  • Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics

    Open Access•David O Brink•Moral Realism and the Foundations…•1989

  • The Myth of Morality

    Open Access•Richard Joyce•Myth of Morality•2001

  • Ethical Intuitionism

    Open Access•Michael Huemer•Ethical Intuitionism•2005

  • The psychology of meta-ethics

    Open Access•Geoffrey P Goodwin, John M Darley•Cognition•2008

  • Folk Moral Relativism

    Open Access•Hagop Sarkissian, John Park et al.•Mind & Language•2011

  • The Sources of Normativity

    Open Access•Christine M Korsgaard, Onora O’neill et al.•Sources of Normativity•1996

  • Beyond objectivism

    Taylor Davis•Philosophical Psychology•2021

  • The irrationality of folk metaethics

    Ross Colebrook•Philosophical Psychology•2021

  • An empirical argument against moral non-cognitivism

    Open Access•Thomas Pölzler, J C Wright•Inquiry•2023

  • The Influence of Social Interaction on Intuitions of Objectivity and Subjectivity

    Open Access•Matthew Fisher, Joshua Knobe et al.•Cognitive Science•2016

  • Intergroup tolerance leads to subjective morality, which in turn is associated with (but does not lead to) reduced religiosity

    Open Access•Ozlem Yilmaz, Hasan G Bahçekapılı et al.•Archive for the Psychology of…•2020

  • Moral Objectivism in Cross-Cultural Perspective

    James R Beebe, Runya Qiaoan et al.•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2015

  • Metasemantics and boydian synthetic moral naturalism

    Open Access•Xinkan Zhao•Synthese•2021

  • Moral Realism

    Peter Railton•The Philosophical Review•1986

  • Language and Reality

    Kenneth A Taylor, Michael Devitt et al.•The Philosophical Review•1990

  • Folk moral objectivism and its measurement

    Open Access•Lieuwe Zijlstra•Journal of Experimental Social…•2019

  • Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others

    Open Access•Geoffrey P Goodwin, John M Darley•Journal of Experimental Social…•2011

  • Without God, everything is permitted? The reciprocal influence of religious and meta-ethical beliefs

    Open Access•Ozlem Yilmaz, Onurcan Yilmaz et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2015

  • Might All Normativity be Queer

    Matthew S Bedke•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2009

  • Moral Realism

    Russ Shafer-Landau, Russ Shafer‐landau•Moral realism•2003

  • Choosing Normative Concepts

    Matti Eklund•Choosing Normative Concepts•2017

  • On the genuine queerness of moral properties and facts

    Richard T Garner•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1990

  • Empirical research on folk moral objectivism

    Open Access•Thomas Pölzler, J C Wright•Philosophy Compass•2019

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae