Navigating Supervisory Conversations About Gen AI
Taboo and Supervisory Power Dynamics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21592350 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J Qi (0000-0003-3511-0712, Social Equity Research Centre RMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia, corresponding author), Jiao Tuxworth (0009-0006-9299-9633, Social Equity Research Centre RMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia), Catherine Gomes (0000-0003-3429-9330, School of Media and Communication RMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Higher Education Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0951-5224 • E-ISSN: 1468-2273 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/hequ.70151 |
| OpenAlex | W7163806544 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 31 |
Generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) technologies have disrupted the longstanding norms and practices of education and research in universities, fueling widespread discussions across the humanities, arts and social sciences (HASS) disciplines including in the community of doctoral education. This qualitative study examines how communication about gen AI use takes place in HASS research supervision meetings, and the ways that doctoral supervisors and international doctoral students navigate these conversations. Thematic analysis of interviews with international doctoral students and doctoral supervisors reveals the use of gen AI by international doctoral students as a delicate and often ‘tabooed’ topic in supervision meetings. We argue that gen AI being a taboo topic in supervisory meetings reflects both the ambiguity surrounding the legitimacy of using gen AI in doctoral research, as well as the influence of intersecting supervisory power dynamics, including structural power , epistemic power and relational power . We recommend supervisory communication strategies to critically facilitate the transition to AI in international doctoral education
Ambiguity · Discipline · Legitimacy · Power structure · Qualitative research · Taboo · The arts · Thematic analysis · Artistic and Creative Research · Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
ChatGPT and a new academic reality
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author
ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI
Exploring the Potential Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on International Students in Higher Education
Opinion Paper
Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT in Higher Education
The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language
ChatGPT Promises and Challenges in Education
Empowering international PhD students
Joking aside
The interplay of learning, analytics and artificial intelligence in education
Culture as Praxis
Content and context in knowledge production
Hass PhD graduate careers and knowledge transfer
The Impact of GenAI ‐Based Collaborative Inquiry on Critical Thinking in Argumentation
A Sociological Conversation with ChatGPT about AI Ethics, Affect and Reflexivity
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |