Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On the Role of Signs in Epicurus’ Legal Theory

Bibliographic Data

ID21593668
AuthorsStephen Connelly (0000-0003-1758-0366, University of Warwick, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume36
Issue3
Pages1033-1057
Publication date2023-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0952-8059 • E-ISSN: 1572-8722
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11196-023-10006-1
OpenAlexW4382292844
LanguageEN
References cited17

Epicurus holds, in Key Doctrine 31, that what is just according to nature is a súmbolon or sign of the interest there is in neither harming one another nor being harmed. Certain readings of this maxim equivocate this legal sign with other signs found in nature, thereby failing to give sufficient weight to the role of reciprocity in its production. Other readings simply import a legal sense from outside of Epicurean doctrine, thereby failing to explain what makes Epicurean súmbola legal. A final set of readings attempt to find a legal rule as a kind of innate concept or Kantian ‘scheme’. This article identifies new sources for understanding súmbolon , drawn principally but not exclusively from Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics . This article offers an original argument that Epicurus adopts Aristotle’s’ image of the tally stick ( symbolon ) as a meeting of often divergent interests which constitutes something new and particularly valuable to the Epicurean: friendship. A theoretical argument is also advanced to support this reading which claims that one person’s reflection on a ‘divine image’ of the end ( telos ) is insufficient to constitute a súmbolon ; rather real (as opposed to abstract or ideal) individual interests are filtered via the mechanism of the tally, that is via the meeting of two given individuals who together generate a sign ( symbolon ) of reciprocal interest in neither harming nor being harmed

Doctrine · Epicureanism · Epistemology · Eudaimonia · Maxim · Political science · Telos · Theology · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • L' Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro.

    Ettore Bignone•L' Aristotele perduto e la…•1973

  • Epicurus

    John M Rist•Epicurus•1972

  • The Sculpted Word

    Bernard Frischer•Sculpted Word•1982

  • Epilogismos

    Malcolm Schofield•Rationality in Greek thought•1996

  • Inference from Signs

    James Allen, James V Allen•Inference from signs•2001

  • Die Rechtsphilosophie der Epikureer.

    Robert Philippson•Archiv für Geschichte der…•1910

  • Epicurus' theological innatism

    Open Access•David Sedley•Epicurus and the Epicurean…•2011

  • The Justice of the Epicurean Wise Man

    Open Access•Paul A Vander Waerdt•The Classical Quarterly•1987

  • The Hellenistic Philosophers

    Open Access•A A Long, David Sedley et al.•Hellenistic Philosophers•1989

  • Limit and Variation in the Epicurean Philosophy

    Phillip De Lacy•Phoenix•1969

  • Aristotle and Political Responsibility

    Open Access•Delba Winthrop•Political Theory•1975

  • Archaeological Methodology

    Open Access•Troels Krarup•Theory Culture & Society•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae