Pandemic sociomaterial bricolage
How vulnerable communities used social media to tackle the Covid-19 crisis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21596100 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fernando Pinto (0000-0002-2063-4372, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Marie Anne Macadar (0000-0003-2744-5352, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Gabriela Viale Pereira (0000-0002-7602-3052, Universität für Weiterbildung Krems) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 374-398 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-09 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Information Technology and People (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0959-3845 • E-ISSN: 1758-5813 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/itp-02-2021-0135 |
| OpenAlex | W4319163469 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 54 |
Purpose This research was conducted to understand how vulnerable communities used social media (SM) tools to face the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Affected by the lack of information and the absence of effective public policies, residents from slums in the city of Rio de Janeiro displayed new and unexpected uses to SM tools to tackle the health and socio-economic impacts of the pandemic. Design/methodology/approach The research methodology consisted of a qualitative, exploratory study, combining a series of in-depth interviews with the analysis of various posts, containing videos and texts, extracted from SM during the first six months of the pandemic. The data were collected in the context of 10 different communities in Rio de Janeiro city. Findings In the context of the pandemic, people combined different uses of SM not only to inform themselves and communicate with others but also to articulate and execute fundraising and food donation strategies within vulnerable communities. Accordingly, this SM use is characterized by improvisation, learning by doing and building resilience, which are all constructs related to the concept of bricolage. Users had no specific SM knowledge, and adjusted these technological tools to emergent new activities in practice, which is characteristic of sociomaterial process. In addition to emphasizing the importance of context for the emergence of the phenomenon, this work also highlights reliability, validity and authority as characteristics related to the citizen-led participation approach that was observed. Research limitations/implications Future research can develop approaches based on pandemic sociomaterial bricolage (PSB) aspects, which could guide governments and practitioners on building innovative solutions for the use of SM by the population, especially in emergency situations. Originality/value This study proposes a framework, termed PSB, to represent SM usage promoted by the pandemic context, which emerged from the triangulation of empirical data and an analysis based on the concepts of bricolage and sociomateriality
Bricolage · Geography · Pandemic · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social media · Social science · Sociology · ICT in Developing Communities · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction · Medicine · Smart Cities and Technologies
Socializing in emergencies—A review of the use of social media in emergency situations
Sociomaterial Practices
Social media influence in the Covid-19 Pandemic
Social media in emergency management
Social Bricolage
Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling
Challenge Social Innovation
Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality
Social Media Use as Urban Acupuncture for Empowering Socially Challenged Communities
Makerspaces on Social Media
Beyond just politics
Energy poverty and social relations
Digital Inequality and Second-Order Disasters
Clickolage
The Design and Implementation of XiaoIce, an Empathetic Social Chatbot
Opening the black box
Analyzing youth digital participation
From thinking to tinkering
Society 4.0 applied in Africa
Social media and disasters
Participation, Remediation, Bricolage
Sampling Knowledge
The sociomateriality of organisational life
Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |