The impact of the Covid-19 era on geographical and relational proximities in innovation processes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21601515 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fatih Altuğ (0000-0001-9163-6116, Ondokuz Mayıs University, corresponding author), Kamile Akkoyun (0000-0001-5008-2049, Ondokuz Mayıs University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 1337-1363 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Planning Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0965-4313 • E-ISSN: 1469-5944 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09654313.2026.2638391 |
| OpenAlex | W7135143045 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 65 |
This study examines how the COVID-19 pandemic reshaped the relative importance of geographical and relational proximities in firm-level innovation processes. Lockdowns and social-distancing measures disrupted established economic and social routines, constraining face-to-face interaction and raising questions about the resilience of proximity-based innovation dynamics. Drawing on the proximity framework, the study employs a retrospective survey design comparing innovation-related interactions before and during the pandemic. Data were collected through face-to-face surveys with high-technology manufacturing firms, with the sample closely approximating the regional population of such firms. Paired-sample comparisons are used to identify changes across proximity dimensions. Geographical proximity is operationalized not as physical distance, but as a facilitating condition for local interaction and face-to-face knowledge exchange. The results show that while overall access to knowledge and learning channels remained stable, proximity dimensions relying on in-person interaction declined markedly during the pandemic. Geographical and social proximities were the most negatively affected, particularly in sectoral knowledge exchange and direct communication with clients and suppliers. In contrast, cognitive proximity retained its importance, while organizational and institutional proximities remained stable. Overall, the findings demonstrate that the pandemic weakened some forms of proximity while reinforcing others, contributing firm-level evidence to debates on proximity dynamics and regional resilience
Human geography · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts · COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, Migration · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Proximity and inter‐organizational collaboration
Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation
Determinants of regional resilience to economic crisis
Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during Covid-19 pandemic era
Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation
Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations
An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust
Face-to-Face, Buzz, and Knowledge Bases
Regional resilience
The economic resilience of regions
The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters
Lock-in or lock-out? How structural properties of knowledge networks affect regional resilience
On the notion of regional economic resilience
Defining clusters of related industries
Differentiated Knowledge Bases and Varieties of Regional Innovation Systems
The social cohesion investment
The geography of innovation in times of crisis
The real effects of financial constraints
Commuting and innovation
Proximity and Localization
On the Role and Interrelationship of Spatial, Social and Cognitive Proximity
Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects
Between Luminaires and Meat Grinders
Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks
Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography
Proximity and Innovation
Proximity and Innovation
Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities
Being There
Institutions
The Dynamics of Technical and Business Knowledge Networks in Industrial Clusters
| Highly cited | No |
|---|