Too much of a good thing
Frequent retrieval can impair immediate new learning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21602014 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Meltem Karaca (0000-0002-8460-9977, University of Massachusetts Lowell, corresponding author), Nayantara Kurpad (0000-0002-7269-4537, University of Massachusetts Lowell), Miko M Wilford (0000-0002-8653-8893, University of Massachusetts Lowell), Sara D Davis (0000-0002-3915-6921, University of North Florida) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 1181-1190 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Memory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0965-8211 • E-ISSN: 1464-0686 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09658211.2020.1826526 |
| PMID | 33016214 |
| OpenAlex | W3090666844 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 27 |
Interpolated testing can reduce mind-wandering and proactive interference, and improve note-taking. However, recent research using face-name-profession triads, has also shown that interpolated testing can impair new learning (Davis, Chan, & Wilford, 2017 Davis, S. D., Chan, J. C., & Wilford, M. M. (2017). The dark side of interpolated testing: Frequent switching between retrieval and encoding impairs new learning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.002[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). In the current study, we further examined the impact of switching from testing to new learning, but with objectively-true materials. The study employed a 2 (Interpolated task: Test vs. Restudy) × 3 (Task-switch frequency: 0, 11, 35) between-participants design. In two experiments, participants restudied or retrieved originally-learned flag-country associations and learned new flag-capital (Experiment 1) or flag-export (Experiment 2) associations. Task-switch frequency varied such that participants switched to new learning trial(s) after every restudy/test trial (35-switches), after every three restudy/test trials (11-switches), or did not switch at all (0-switch). The results further demonstrate that retrieving previously-learned material can impair learning of new associations by replicating Davis et al. (2017 Davis, S. D., Chan, J. C., & Wilford, M. M. (2017). The dark side of interpolated testing: Frequent switching between retrieval and encoding impairs new learning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.002[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) with objectively-true materials
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Memory test · Cognitive Functions and Memory · Memory Processes and Influences · Mind wandering and attention · Neuroscience · Psychology
The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention
Task switching
Test-Enhanced Learning
The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning
Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks.
Scientific Utopia
Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention
Retrieval potentiates new learning
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2024 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |