Item-method directed forgetting and perceived truth of news headlines
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21602128 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Magdalena Abel (0000-0003-0107-3255, Department of Experimental Psychology, Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany, corresponding author), Karl-Heinz T Bäuml (0000-0002-4966-9288, Department of Experimental Psychology, Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 1371-1386 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-26 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Memory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0965-8211 • E-ISSN: 1464-0686 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09658211.2023.2267191 |
| PMID | 37819019 |
| OpenAlex | W4387539973 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 74 |
Research on item-method directed forgetting (IMDF) suggests that memories can be voluntarily forgotten. IMDF is however usually examined with relatively simple study materials, such as single words or pictures. In the present study, we examined voluntary forgetting of news headlines from (presumably) untrustworthy sources. Experiment 1 found intact IMDF when to-be-forgotten headlines were characterised as untrustworthy and to-be-remembered headlines were characterised as trustworthy. Experiment 2 separated remember/forget cues and trustworthiness prompts. Forget cues alone had a large effect on memory, but only a small reducing effect on perceived truth. In contrast, trustworthiness prompts alone had essentially no effect on memory, but a large effect on perceived truth. Finally, Experiment 3 fully crossed forget/remember cues and trustworthiness prompts, revealing that forget cues can reduce memory irrespective of whether headlines are characterised as trustworthy or untrustworthy. Moreover, forget cues may bias source attributions, which can explain their small reducing effect on perceived truth. Overall, this work suggests that news headlines can be voluntarily forgotten. At least when people are motivated to forget information from untrustworthy sources, such forgetting may be helpful for curtailing the spread of false information
Attribution · Cognitive psychology · Forgetting · Motivated forgetting · Retrieval-induced forgetting · Trustworthiness · Memory Processes and Influences · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychological and Educational Research Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology
The Truth About the Truth
Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements
Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting
Frequency and the conference of referential validity
Truth by Repetition
Judging Truth
The Raven's Progressive Matrices
Negative Emotion Enhances Memory Accuracy
G*Power 3
A reproducible systematic map of research on the illusory truth effect
Emotional memories are (usually) harder to forget
Recollection of “true” feedback is better than “false” feedback independently of a priori beliefs
The influence of cue probability on item and source judgments in item method directed forgetting
The effects of repetition spacing on the illusory truth effect
How do we remember public events? Pioneering a new area of everyday memory research
A multinomial modeling approach to dissociate different components of the truth effect
Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth
Reading is believing
Consumer Demand for Cynical and Negative News Frames
Mediatization and the Disproportionate Attention to Negative News
The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity
Determinants of judged validity
News, Politics, and Negativity
Self-reference and the encoding of personal information
Segregation accuracy in item-method directed forgetting across multiple tests
The self-reference effect in memory
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |