Comparing two unitisation manipulations
Effects on familiarity, recollection-based recognition, and semantic interference
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21602207 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fan Zhou (0000-0002-0400-9366, Northeast Normal University), Yingjie Jiang (0000-0002-9965-5474, Northeast Normal University, corresponding author), Yang Yue (0009-0001-8732-7617, Northeast Normal University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 308-319 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Memory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0965-8211 • E-ISSN: 1464-0686 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09658211.2024.2314516 |
| PMID | 38335303 |
| OpenAlex | W4391677267 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 56 |
The recognition of associative memory can be significantly influenced by the use of an encoding strategy known as unitisation, which has been implemented through various manipulations. However, [Shao, H., Opitz, B., Yang, J., & Weng, X. (2016). Recollection reduces unitised familiarity effect. Memory (Hove, England), 24(4), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1021258] found intriguing distinctions between two common manipulations, the compound task and the imagery task, leading to a dispute. We propose that differences in levels of processing in the imagery task may account for these discrepancies. This study tested our hypothesis using two approaches. The first two experiments utilised the R/K paradigm to investigate the effects of these methods on familiarity-based and recollection-based recognition. The results demonstrated that familiarity was increased in the compound task, while recollection was increased in the imagery task. In the subsequent two experiments, an interference paradigm was employed to examine differences in semantic processing within the two tasks. The results showed that the compound task did not impact participants’ inclination towards lures, while the imagery task led to a bias towards semantic lures over episodic lures, suggesting that the two encodings in the imagery task involve different levels of semantic processing. These results support our hypothesis and underscore the importance of carefully choosing comparisons that account for other variables in the study of unitisation
Associative property · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Episodic memory · Levels-of-processing effect · Recall · Recognition memory · Semantic memory · Cognitive Functions and Memory · Memory and Neural Mechanisms · Memory Processes and Influences · Neuroscience · Psychology
Recollection and familiarity
Memory and consciousness.
Functional aspects of recollective experience
Thirty Years and Counting
Remembering and knowing
The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity
Levels of processing
Levels of processing
PsychoPy2
G*Power 3
Signal-Detection, Threshold, and Dual-Process Models of Recognition Memory
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |