Epistemically exploitative bullshit
A Sartrean account
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21603152 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Szanto (0000-0001-5114-677X, Center for Subjectivity Research, Department of Communication University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 711-730 |
| Publication date | 2023-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0966-8373 • E-ISSN: 1468-0378 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ejop.12810 |
| PMID | 38505577 |
| OpenAlex | W4283802896 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 53 |
This paper presents a novel conceptualization of a type of untruthful speech that is of eminent political relevance but has hitherto been unrecognized: epistemically exploitative bullshit (EEB). Speakers engaging in EEB are bullshitting: they deceive their addressee regarding their unconcern for the very difference between truth and falsity. At the same time, they exploit their discursive victims: they oblige their counterparts to perform unacknowledged and emotionally draining epistemic work to educate the speakers about the addressees' oppression, only to discredit their epistemic trustworthiness. I argue that EEB is irreducible to various recently discussed untruthful speech, and in particular to Frankfurtian bullshit, as well as to epistemic exploitation or other epistemic injustices. Taking inspiration from Sartre's analysis of anti‐Semitic discourse, where bullshitting and epistemic exploitation are essentially interlinked, I instead suggest that recognizing the distinctiveness of EEB allows for a more refined conceptualization of these discursive phenomena. Specifically, I show how bad faith and the ensuing collective diffusion and delegation of epistemic responsibility play a so far neglected but key role here. I ultimately demonstrate that with Sartre's help, we can grasp how the existential, interpersonal and institutional dimensions involved in the negotiation of truth seamlessly intersect better than we would with the lens of analytic or critical epistemology alone
Epistemology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Lying, Misleading, and What is Said
Lying and Insincerity
Lying and Deception
Bald‐faced Lies! Lying Without the Intent to Deceive
Varieties of Epistemic Injustice 1
What Is Lying?
Epistemic Exploitation
Sacralizing Hostility
Epistemically exploitative bullshit
Anticipatory Epistemic Injustice
Affective injustice and fundamental affective goods
Objective falsity is essential to lying
Aspects of a theory of bullshit
Racist Variations of Bad Faith
Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression
A Cautionary Tale
What Is Disinformation
The Epistemology of Resistance
Sartre, Jews, and the Other
Turning Up the Lights on Gaslighting
Why I’m no longer talking to white people about race’
The Aptness of Anger
Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing
Performative Force, Convention, and Discursive Injustice
Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice
A unified account of information, misinformation, and disinformation
Affective Intentionality and Affective Injustice
Extracted Speech
Visible identities
Epistemic Injustice
Lying, Deceiving, and Misleading
Being and Nothingness
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |