Algorithmic Experience Governance
Reimagining Creativity and Co-creation in AI-driven Platforms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21605884 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Faizan Ali (0000-0003-2168-861X, Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway, corresponding author), Fahad Mohammed Alhuqbani (0000-0003-4373-5771, King Saud University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Creative Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0973-2586 • E-ISSN: 0973-2594 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/09732586261459526 |
| OpenAlex | W7166798313 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 42 |
Generative artificial intelligence has become embedded infrastructure across creative platforms, yet scholarship continues to treat AI primarily as a creative tool or co-creative agent, without interrogating the structural conditions under which creative work unfolds. This article introduces the concept of algorithmic experience governance (AEG): the upstream structuring of creative participation, visibility, sequencing, evaluation and meaning-making through AI-driven platform systems. Drawing on platform ecosystem theory, institutional theory and socio-technical systems theory, the article develops an integrated framework that identifies five governance mechanisms, that is, algorithmic curation, sequencing and path dependency, personalisation as steering, generative mediation and evaluative framing, and maps them across individual, community, platform and ecosystem levels. The framework is grounded in the communicative dynamics of contemporary platforms, including TikTok’s narrative formats, influencer storytelling practices, AI-mediated branding, meme circulation and the cultural semiotics of AI-generated content. Three governance paradoxes and three recursive feedback loops capture the tensions and dynamics inherent in algorithmic governance of creative experience. Four formal propositions reframe creativity under AEG as structurally situated rather than diminished, and a research agenda of 20 questions offers a programme for empirical investigation. The article argues that creativity in AI-driven platforms is not merely collaborative but governed collaboratively and that understanding this distinction is central to reimagining theory and practice
Conceptualization · Corporate governance · Creativity · Dialogic · Generative grammar · Grounded theory · Mediation · Narrative · Scholarship · Situated · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Digital Media and Philosophy · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Social Media and the Public Interest
The Creative Mind
If…Then
The Marketplace of Attention
Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content
Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms
Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed
Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development
Artificial intelligence in the creative industries
The Relevance of Algorithms
Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity
Understanding and Creating Art with AI
The Standard Definition of Creativity
The Black Box Society
Artificial Intelligence & Creativity
Seeing without knowing
AI agency vs. human agency
Musicians as Workers and the Gig Economy
Rethinking creativity
Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting
On the Democratic Role of News Recommenders
Cross-cultural approaches to creative media content in the age of AI
The social psychology of creativity
What is platform governance
The Iron Cage Revisited
Artificial Intelligence and Creativity
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |