The social structure of Brexit and the crisis of globalisation
Towards an analysis of the disjuncture
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21608293 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emilia Dowling (0000-0001-8710-8265, University of Vienna, corresponding author), Emma Dowling |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 257-277 |
| Publication date | 2021-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1011-0070 • E-ISSN: 1862-2585 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11614-021-00443-2 |
| OpenAlex | W3138022419 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 52 |
Despite much protracted debate, there is still no consensus among social scientists as to why a majority of Britons voted to leave the European Union in June 2016. This paper constructs a sociology of Brexit and seeks to interpret the fractious constellations on either side of the Brexit disjuncture. Taking as its point of the departure the resurgence of sociological interest in class in the wake of Brexit and with the rise of right-wing populisms in recent years, the paper argues for a compositional, intersectional and historically dynamic class analysis of Brexit’s political fault-lines within the context of Britain’s neoliberal restructuring. An analytical framework is proposed with which to explain how neoliberal globalisation has transformed British society and its concomitant class relations, accounting for the disarticulation of previous political allegiances. The paper explains the Brexit vote in terms of central social-structural components, including class, ethnicity, geographical region, age, and educational attainment. It is argued that the vote in 2016 to leave the European Union is best interpreted as a residue of a post-war class compromise, while the vote to remain in the European Union reflects a class constellation recomposed by neoliberal globalisation, which is unstable and in crisis. The article concludes with a discussion of the overall implications of the argument presented for a sociological reading of Brexit
Brexit · Economics · European union · Globalization · International trade · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Employment and Welfare Studies · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Brexit
The Politics of Fear
Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined
The malaise of the squeezed middle
Brexit
Distinction
Race and the Undeserving Poor
Conservative Regimes and the Transition to Post-Fordism
Building the 'Boris' bloc
Distinction
Youthquake 2017
The depths of the cuts
Austerity, ageing and the financialisation of pensions policy in the UK
Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism
Putting Our Own People First
Reviving Hayek’s Dream
The Organic Crisis of the British State
Financialisation, Financial Literacy and Asset-Based Welfare
The Regressive Recovery
Be creative
Eighteenth‐century English society
Of Crises and Conjunctures
The Divisive Welfare State
Capitalist Development and Crisis Theory
Intersectionality and Primary Accumulation
Affective atmospheres
Northern Ireland and Brexit
Brexit
Our Island Story
Resources, Values, Identity
Right-wing populism in Europe & USA
Brexit
The Brexit vote
Brexit, Trump, and 'methodological whiteness
Class in the 21st century
Trends in the Turn to Affect
Workfare
The Affective Turn
A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC's Great British Class Survey Experiment
Anxiety and cosmopolitan futures
Racism, Crisis, Brexit
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |