Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Die begrippe ‘gemeen akkoord’ en ‘buite kerkverband plaas’ in kerkregtelike perspektief

Bibliographic Data

ID21609756
AuthorsJ M Vorster (0000-0003-4529-5343, North-West University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume58
Issue1
Publication date2024-05-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueIn die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1018-6441 • E-ISSN: 2305-0853
PublisherAOSIS (PUBLISHER • ZA)
DOI10.4102/ids.v58i1.3076
OpenAlexW4399136099
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited17

burning issue in Reformed Churches world-wide and even resulted in divisions and schisms. This is currently also the case in the community of the Reformed Churches in South Africa (RCA) (Gereformeerde Kerke in Suid-Afrika [GKSA]). The 2009 General Synod of the RCA resolved that women may not be ordained in the offices of ministers and elders. Subsequent Synods re-affirmed this decisions by a mere majority of votes according to Article 31 of the Church Order of the RCA. Despite these resolutions of various Synods, some local churches proceeded with the ordination of women in the applicable offices. Two of these local churches were subsequently excluded from the community of Reformed Churches within the RCA, by two classes with the argument that they disregarded the ‘common concent’ underlying the official synodical decisions. This study focuses on the question: what is ‘common consent’ within the context of Reformed Church polity and does this polity enable major assemblies to exclude local churches form the church community merely by way of a motion, just because they cannot reach concensus about a synodical resolution? The central-theoretical argument of the study is that the concepts ‘mutual consent’, as well as ‘exclusion from the church community’, should be revisited, because the current ‘application of these ideas in the RCA results in irresponsible collective church discipline, leads to schism in the church community, the binding of consciences and the violation of the rights of called church officials’. Contribution: This article proposes a responsible code of conduct in the RCA regarding the matter of local congregations that cannot, as a matter of conscience and after many petitions of protest, adhere to the synodical decisions about the prohibiting of the ordination of women in local churches. ‘Mutual consent’ cannot be understood in an absolute sense and ‘exclusion of the church community’ is a hierarchical action that runs against the core principles of Presbyterial church polity. A more responsible code is of the utmost importance

Christian Theology and Mission · Philosophy · Reformed Theology and Governance · Religion, Society, and Development

  • Theological perspectives on the Presbyterial church governance system

    Open Access•Nico Vorster•In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi•2024

  • Strategic Barriers to Dispute Resolution

    Robert H Mnookin•Journal of Institutional and…•2003

  • Sufficient Consensus

    Kai A Konrad•Journal of Institutional and…•2003

  • Empirically Testable Causal Mechanism for Divine Action

    Open Access•Arlyn Culwick, Ryan L Faber et al.•Stellenbosch Theological Journal•2021

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae