Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale
Relationship to Occupation and Measurement Invariance across Gender
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21612254 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kirill G Miroshnik (0000-0001-9855-1123, St Petersburg University, corresponding author), Olga V Shcherbakova (0000-0002-9200-4310, St Petersburg University), James C Kaufman (0000-0003-0595-2820, University of Connecticut, Connecticut) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 159-177 |
| Publication date | 2022-04-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Creativity Research Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1040-0419 • E-ISSN: 1532-6934 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10400419.2021.1953823 |
| OpenAlex | W3162175832 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 85 |
Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS) is a self-report of creative behavior in five distinct domains. The present study aims to translate K-DOCS into Russian and evaluate its psychometric properties. The psychometric analysis was performed on a sample of adults recruited through Yandex Toloka (N = 1011; Mage = 35.94, SDage = 10.95) from various regions of Russia and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the model with five correlated factors showed the best fit to empirical data. All factors demonstrated good internal consistency and moderate test–retest reliability. The correlation and hierarchical regression analyses for K-DOCS factors, creative achievements by CBI (Creative Behavior Inventory), and personality traits by BFI–2 (Big Five Inventory – 2) yielded evidence for an adequate level of convergent and discriminant validity. We also examined differences across K-DOCS factors among occupations defined by Holland’s typology and attempted to investigate K-DOCS measurement invariance across gender. As a result, we obtained evidence supporting the construct validity of K-DOCS and established its partial measurement invariance across gender. The current study shows that Russian K-DOCS has satisfactory psychometric properties and can serve as a trusted guide into various manifestations of humans’ creative behavior
Confirmatory factor analysis · Construct validity · Convergent validity · Creativity · Developmental psychology · Discriminant validity · Internal consistency · Measurement invariance · Psychometrics · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Clinical Psychology · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports · Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology
Latent mean differences between men and women
La escala de los dominios de creatividad de Kaufman
Gender Bias in Creativity
Condensing the Muses
Do You Think You Are Creative? Patterns of Self-Perceived Creativity in Adolescents and Young Adults
Creative Potential and Creative Self‐Belief
Nothing But Stereotypes? Negligible Sex Differences Across Creativity Measures in Science, Arts, and Sports Adolescent High Achievers
Testing the Domain Specificity of Creativity with Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale
A Reliability Generalization Meta‐Analysis of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale
Psychometric properties of the Spanish creative self-efficacy inventory in an Argentine university population
The Road to Creative Achievement
Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices
Effect of the Number of Variables on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling
Factor Analysis with Ordinal Indicators
Assessing creativity with self-report scales
Construct Explication through Factor or Component Analysis
How to Use a Monte Carlo Study to Decide on Sample Size and Determine Power
Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis.
Confidence intervals for population reliability coefficients
MVN
Robust Tests for the Equality of Variances
Opening up Openness to Experience
A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity
Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure.
Instrument translation process
Counting the muses
CFI versus RMSEA
RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data
Bridging generality and specificity
Assessment of real-life creativity
Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis
On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha
When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.
Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance
In Search of Golden Rules
Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.
Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here.
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research
Creative Actions Scale
The Importance of Factor-Trueness and Validity, Versus Homogeneity and Orthogonality, in Test Scales1
The Hull Method for Selecting the Number of Common Factors
Ordinary Least Squares Estimation of Parameters in Exploratory Factor Analysis With Ordinal Data
The Problem with Having Two Watches
Openness to Experience and Intellect Differentially Predict Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences
Detecting careless respondents in web-based questionnaires
The Cross-Cultural Invariance of Creative Cognition
Assessing test–retest reliability of patient-reported outcome measures using intraclass correlation coefficients
Family policy, employment and gender-role attitudes
Teacher implicit beliefs of creativity
Detecting outliers
Between facets and domains
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2)
| Citations per year | 3.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |