Assessing the Impact of Visualizations of Quantitative and Qualitative Risk Information on the Comprehension of Hypothetical Risk-Based Breast Cancer Screening Results
Bibliographic Data
This study aimed to assess whether, in the context of communicating risk-based breast cancer screening results, visualizations of risk information consisting of an icon array depicting quantified breast cancer risk and simplified drawings for “qualitative” risk information (e.g. risk factors, screening frequency) offer added value compared to a textual format presenting numerical information. An online experiment was conducted with a 3 (information format: text with numbers – text with risk visualizations – interactive) ×4 (breast cancer risk category: slightly decreased, average, slightly increased, increased) between-subjects design. We recruited n = 1,047 women aged 40–74 years from the general Dutch population, including 413 (39.4%) with lower education and 269 (25.7%) with a family history of breast cancer. Participants viewed hypothetical screening results. Primary outcomes were verbatim and gist comprehension of numerical probability information and verbatim comprehension of qualitative risk information. Secondary outcomes (e.g. affective reactions, perceived likelihood) and health literacy, numeracy, and graph literacy were also assessed. Results showed no significant differences in comprehension between “text with risk visualizations” and “text with numbers” formats. Verbatim comprehension of numerical probability and qualitative risk information was worse in the “interactive” format compared to “text with numbers” format. Those assigned to a non-average risk category exhibited lower verbatim and gist comprehension. Overall, the visualizations tested in this study did not enhance comprehension of risk-based breast cancer screening results compared to a text format with numerical information. Understanding risk-based screening results may be challenging regardless of format, particularly for people assigned to a non-average risk category
Breast cancer · Breast cancer screening · Comprehension · Health literacy · Qualitative research · Risk assessment · Risk perception · Think aloud protocol · BRCA gene mutations in cancer · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
The role of pictures in improving health communication
The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography
Design Features of Graphs in Health Risk Communication
A Theory of Medical Decision Making and Health
General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples
Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes
Communicating Probabilities of Cervical Cancer Screening Results with Icon Arrays or Tree Diagrams
Cocreation with Dutch patients of decision‐relevant information to support shared decision‐making about adjuvant treatment in breast cancer care
Acceptability of risk stratification within population‐based cancer screening from the perspective of the general public
Dual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience
A short assessment of health literacy (Sahl) in the Netherlands
Australian Women’s Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk Factors and the Risk of Developing Breast Cancer
Salience Versus Proportional Reasoning
How representations of number and numeracy predict decision paradoxes
Context and the interpretation of likelihood information
Women’s Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk
The Pitfalls of Visual Representations
Perception
How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |