Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Pathways to learning

Exploring high school students’ learning of AI-powered educational robotics

Bibliographic Data

ID21618671
AuthorsG McLaughlin (Kent State University), E Novak (Kent State University, corresponding author), S Ahmadi (0000-0002-7330-0528, Kent State University), J Li (0000-0002-0260-3169), Jian-Bin Li (0000-0002-8995-3304, Kent State University), Y Guo (0000-0002-7060-8404, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology), R Liu (0000-0001-7745-5933, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology), L Borgerding (Kent State University)
Year2026
Publication date2026-06-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational Technology Research and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1042-1629 • E-ISSN: 1556-6501
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11423-026-10651-w
OpenAlexW7166740198
LanguageEN
References cited39

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes more embedded in daily life, it is also reshaping educational tools, including robotics in K-12 settings. AI-powered robots offer new opportunities in educational robotics by enabling capabilities such as perceiving their surroundings, understanding movement patterns, recognizing images, and responding to user input. While prior research highlights the positive impact of educational robots on learners’ computer science attitudes and skills, less is known about how students develop their understanding of robotics itself. Drawing on constructionist theories—particularly the idea of epistemological pluralism—we examined the diverse ways students engage with and make sense of AI-powered robotics. We conducted a qualitative study with 15 high school students participating in a semester-long project-based robotics and AI curriculum. We explored two key questions: (1) How do high school students develop their understanding of robotics in a project-based robotics + AI curriculum? (2) How do high school students develop their understanding of AI in a project-based robotics + AI curriculum? We analyzed qualitative data from interviews, field notes, student artifacts, and final presentations. Our thematic analysis revealed three themes regarding how students learned AI-powered robotics: (1) learning through engagement in real-world robotics practices, (2) learning through designing, and (3) learning through playful and creative expressions. These findings add to the research on alternative ways learners can engage with and learn AI-powered robotics through project-based learning

Deep learning · Educational robotics · Educational technology · Qualitative research · Robot · Robotics · Thematic analysis · Science Education and Pedagogy · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Teaching and Learning Programming

  • Coding as a playground

    Open Access•Marina Umaschi Bers, Carina Soledad González González et al.•Computers & Education•2019

  • Scratch

    Open Access•Mitchel Resnick, John Maloney et al.•Communications of the ACM•2009

  • Engaging High School Students in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Through Engineering Design Robotics Education

    Open Access•Elena Novak, Sharare Ahmadi et al.•Education Sciences•2026

  • A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots

    Nilüfer Atman Uslu, Gulay Öztüre Yavuz et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2023

  • Effects of robotics STEM camps on rural elementary students’ self-efficacy and computational thinking

    Open Access•Xiaojing Shang, Zhujun Jiang et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2023

  • The case for alternative endpoints in computing education

    Open Access•Mike Tissenbaum, David Weintrop et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2021

  • One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis

    Braun, Victoria Clarke•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2020

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Play-based strategies and using robot technologies across the curriculum

    Rikke Berggreen Paaskesen•International Journal of Play•2020

  • The Mangle of Practice

    Andrew Pickering•Mangle of Practice•1995

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae