Pathways to learning
Exploring high school students’ learning of AI-powered educational robotics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21618671 |
|---|---|
| Authors | G McLaughlin (Kent State University), E Novak (Kent State University, corresponding author), S Ahmadi (0000-0002-7330-0528, Kent State University), J Li (0000-0002-0260-3169), Jian-Bin Li (0000-0002-8995-3304, Kent State University), Y Guo (0000-0002-7060-8404, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology), R Liu (0000-0001-7745-5933, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology), L Borgerding (Kent State University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-30 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Educational Technology Research and Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1042-1629 • E-ISSN: 1556-6501 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11423-026-10651-w |
| OpenAlex | W7166740198 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 39 |
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes more embedded in daily life, it is also reshaping educational tools, including robotics in K-12 settings. AI-powered robots offer new opportunities in educational robotics by enabling capabilities such as perceiving their surroundings, understanding movement patterns, recognizing images, and responding to user input. While prior research highlights the positive impact of educational robots on learners’ computer science attitudes and skills, less is known about how students develop their understanding of robotics itself. Drawing on constructionist theories—particularly the idea of epistemological pluralism—we examined the diverse ways students engage with and make sense of AI-powered robotics. We conducted a qualitative study with 15 high school students participating in a semester-long project-based robotics and AI curriculum. We explored two key questions: (1) How do high school students develop their understanding of robotics in a project-based robotics + AI curriculum? (2) How do high school students develop their understanding of AI in a project-based robotics + AI curriculum? We analyzed qualitative data from interviews, field notes, student artifacts, and final presentations. Our thematic analysis revealed three themes regarding how students learned AI-powered robotics: (1) learning through engagement in real-world robotics practices, (2) learning through designing, and (3) learning through playful and creative expressions. These findings add to the research on alternative ways learners can engage with and learn AI-powered robotics through project-based learning
Deep learning · Educational robotics · Educational technology · Qualitative research · Robot · Robotics · Thematic analysis · Science Education and Pedagogy · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Teaching and Learning Programming
Coding as a playground
Scratch
Engaging High School Students in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Through Engineering Design Robotics Education
A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots
Effects of robotics STEM camps on rural elementary students’ self-efficacy and computational thinking
The case for alternative endpoints in computing education
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Play-based strategies and using robot technologies across the curriculum
The Mangle of Practice
| Highly cited | No |
|---|