Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Deception by device

Are we more self-serving on laptops or cell phones

Bibliographic Data

ID21620198
AuthorsTerri R Kurtzberg, Terri Kurtzberg (0000-0001-8926-2717, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey), Charles E Naquin (DePaul University), Mason Ameri (0000-0003-4181-0811, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey)
Year2022
Volume33
Issue4
Pages569-591
Publication date2022-06-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Conflict Management (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1044-4068 • E-ISSN: 1758-8545
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/ijcma-10-2021-0157
OpenAlexW4220915791
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited51

Purpose As both workplace and personal interactions increasingly move into online discussions, the impact of various technological devices (such as cell phones and laptops) on behaviors and decisions must be better understood. This study aims to assess whether tasks done on cell phones or laptops prompt more deception for the sake of personal gain in decisions and negotiations, based on the associations held about each device. Design/methodology/approach Four empirical studies plus a single-study meta-analysis explore the rates of self-serving deceptive behavior based on the type of device used in decision-making tasks (ultimatum-game bargaining and negotiations). Findings Results show that using a laptop prompted more self-serving behavior than using a cell phone. Follow-up studies suggest that the dominant associations that people hold with each device – professional ones for the laptop and personal ones for cell phone – may help drive this effect. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is among the first to establish a link between technological device and behavioral outcomes in negotiations, even when the exact format of the information sent and received is identical (i.e. text-only format). The findings have implications for selecting devices for important negotiations and decisions, as some may promote more ethical behavior than others

Deception · Internet privacy · Laptop · Negotiation · Originality · Phone · Sociology · Computer Science · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Ethically Questionable Negotiation Strategies in South Asia

    Open Access•Zhenzhong Ma, Kun Li et al.•Group Decision and Negotiation•2023

  • Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations

    Thomas M Jones•Academy of Management Review•1991

  • Cheating among college and university students

    Open Access•Donald L Mccabe•International Journal for…•2005

  • The Impact of Social Value Orientations on Negotiator Cognition and Behavior

    Open Access•Carsten K W De Dreu, Paul A M Van Lange•Personality and Social Psychology…•1995

  • Virtual Teams Research

    Open Access•Lucy L Gilson, M Travis Maynard et al.•Journal of Management•2015

  • Ethically adrift

    Open Access•Celia Moore, Francesca Gino•Research in Organizational Behavior•2013

  • Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design

    Open Access•Richard L Daft, Robert H Lengel•Management Science•1986

  • Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2009

  • “It’s Just Business”

    Open Access•McKenzie R Rees, McKenzie Rees et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2022

  • User Representations in Human-Computer Interaction

    Open Access•Sofia Seinfeld, Tiare Feuchtner et al.•Human-Computer Interaction•2020

  • Social Value Orientation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas

    Open Access•Daniel Balliet, Craig D Parks et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2009

  • Interpersonal Deception Theory

    Open Access•David B Buller, Judee K Burgoon•Communication Theory•1996

  • Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity

    Open Access•B Simpson, R Willer•Social Psychology Quarterly•2008

  • Motivational bases of choice in experimental games

    Open Access•David M Messick, Charles G Mcclintock•Journal of Experimental Social…•1968

  • Fun and Games

    Open Access•Barry R Schlenker, Thomas V Bonoma•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1978

  • Template matching

    Daryl J Bem, J Daryl et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1979

  • Human “resources”? Objectification at work

    Peter Belmi, Jonathan Schroeder•Journal of Personality and Social…•2021

  • The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes

    Paul A M Van Lange•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities

    Open Access•Albert Bandura•Personality and Social Psychology…•1999

  • Possessions and the Extended Self

    Russell William Belk•Journal of Consumer Research•1988

  • Mobile Persuasion

    Open Access•Ki Joon Kim, Sundar et al.•Human Communication Research•2016

  • Single-Paper Meta-Analysis

    Open Access•Blakeley B Mcshane, Ulf Böckenholt et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2017

  • Extended Self in a Digital World

    Russell William Belk•Journal of Consumer Research•2013

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae