Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Attitudes of Dutch Citizens toward Sow Husbandry with Regard to Animals, Humans, and the Environment

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2162045
AutoresTamara Bergstra (Department of Social Sciences, chair group Business Economics, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands), T J Bergstra (autor de correspondencia), H Hogeveen (0000-0002-9443-1412, Department of Social Sciences, chair group Business Economics, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands), W Erno Kuiper (Department of Social Sciences, chair group Business Economics, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands), Alfons G J M Oude Lansink (Department of Social Sciences, chair group Business Economics, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands), Alfons Oude Lansink (0000-0002-9273-6044), Elsbeth N Stassen (Department of Animal Sciences, chair group Animals in Society, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands)
Año2017
Volumen30
Número2
Páginas195-211
Fecha de publicación2017-04-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAnthrozoös (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0892-7936 • E-ISSN: 1753-0377
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08927936.2017.1310985
OpenAlexW2616383823
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas43

The pig industry is struggling with negative attitudes of people toward sow husbandry. To be able to respond to these attitudes, the pig industry first has to understand people's attitudes. The first objective of this study was to determine the attitudes of Dutch people toward sow husbandry with regard to animals, humans, and the environment. The second objective was to group people based on their attitudes toward sow husbandry and determine and compare the socio-demographic characteristics of these groups. An online survey was conducted in the Netherlands and there were 1,607 respondents. On average, respondents had negative attitudes toward all issues defined in this study. The most negative attitudes were toward the effect on both animals and consumers of the use of antibiotics, the number of animals kept per square meter, the possibility for animals to go outside, food safety risks, public health risks, and environmental waste. The findings indicate the importance of considering all the issues identified in this study during the process of developing measures to improve people's attitudes toward sow husbandry. Respondents could be divided into four clusters; each cluster represented different attitudes toward sow husbandry and had different socio-demographic characteristics. This makes it possible for the pig industry to assign people with specific socio-demographic characteristics to one of the clusters and predict their attitudes toward sow husbandry. Knowledge of these attitudes enables the pig industry to predict how different groups of people will respond to different animal welfare measures. Results of this study are therefore useful for the pig industry to help improve people's attitudes toward sow husbandry

Agriculture · Animal husbandry · Animal welfare · Biology · Environmental health · Geography · Political science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Veterinary medicine · Welfare · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Medicine · Psychology · Ecology

  • Normative contestation in transitions ‘in the making’

    Open Access•Boelie Elzen, Frank W Geels et al.•Research Policy•2011

  • Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions

    Harold A Herzog•Anthrozoös•2007

  • A Simple Value-Distinction Approach Aids Transparency in Farm Animal Welfare Debate

    Open Access•Karel de Greef, Frans Stafleu et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2006

  • Citizens’ Views on Farm Animal Welfare and Related Information Provision

    Open Access•Filiep Vanhonacker, Els Van Poucke et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2010

  • Societal Concerns about Pork and Pork Production and Their Relationships to the Production System

    Open Access•Egbert Kanis, Ab F Groen et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2003

  • The Concept of Farm Animal Welfare

    Open Access•Filiep Vanhonacker, Wim Verbeke et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2010

  • A Framework for the Ethical Analysis of Novel Foods

    Open Access•Ben Mepham•Journal of Agricultural and…•2000

  • Is Agriculture in Need of Ethics

    Open Access•Hayo Apotheker•Journal of Agricultural and…•2000

  • Farmers Engaged in Deliberative Practices; An Ethnographic Exploration of the Mosaic of Concerns in Livestock Agriculture

    Open Access•Clemens Driessen•Journal of Agricultural and…•2010

  • Dealing with Ambivalence

    Open Access•Hein Te Velde, Noelle Aarts et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2002

  • Ethical Challenges for Livestock Production

    Open Access•Wim Verbeke, Wim A J Verbeke et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2000

  • Social Acceptance of Dairy Farming

    Open Access•B K Boogaard, B B Bock et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2010

  • Design of Web Survey Questionnaires

    Open Access•Katja Lozar Manfreda, Zenel Batagelj et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2006

  • Using Grounded Theory to Examine People's Attitudes Toward How Animals are Used

    Aldert Vrij, Karl Nunkoosing et al.•Society and Animals•2003

  • The Role of Values in Public Opinion Research

    Milton Rokeach•Public Opinion Quarterly•1968

  • Moral Convictions and Culling Animals

    Nina E Cohen, Nina Cohen et al.•Anthrozoös•2012

  • Justifying Attitudes toward Animal Use

    Sarah Knight, Louise Barnett et al.•Anthrozoös•2008

  • Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind

    Sarah Knight, Aldert Vrij et al.•Anthrozoös•2004

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae