Affect lability scale (ALS-18) and ADHD
Incremental validity of depression, depression/anxiety and anger in the predictions of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity in adults
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21625405 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rapson Gomez (0000-0001-7637-1551, RMIT University), Daniel Zarate (0000-0002-1508-8637, RMIT University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 2837-2847 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Current Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1046-1310 • E-ISSN: 1936-4733 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12144-025-07370-5 |
| OpenAlex | W4406630152 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
Affect lability, or difficulties in emotional regulation, has been suggested to be a defining factor in ADHD presentations, with previous studies identifying a relationship between affect lability and ADHD. However, the relationship between different dimensions of lability and ADHD dimensions has not been explored. This study aims to examine whether the three affect lability dimensions– depression/elation (D), depression/anxiety (D/A), and anger (A)– have incremental validity in predicting ADHD symptoms of inattention (IA) and hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI). A total of 558 adults aged 18–65 (Mage = 32.75; 18.8% men) from the general community completed the ALS-18 and the Current Symptom Scale (CSS). A structural equation model (SEM) approach was used to evaluate incremental validity. For a comprehensive evaluation, three different SEM models corresponding to different orders of entry of the predictors were computed to assess the incremental validity of the three ADHD dimensions. Overall, the findings showed that both D/A and D provided comparable incremental validity in the predictions of IA and HI, whereas A did not predict IA and HI. Therefore, D/A and D are important affect lability dimensions for the prediction of ADHD. These results suggest that not all components of affect lability were equally important in explaining ADHD symptoms, indicating the need to consider specific dimensions of affect lability for a more accurate understanding and treatment outcomes. Future research should further explore these relationships, incorporating broader affect lability dimensions and larger samples to generalize findings more effectively
Anger · Anxiety · Impulsivity · Lability · Psychiatry · Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Clinical Psychology · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Emotion Dysregulation in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Emotion Regulation
Psychometric Properties of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (Ders) and Its Short Forms in Adults With Emotional Disorders
Live fast, die young? A review on the developmental trajectories of ADHD across the lifespan
The Prevalence and Correlates of Adult ADHD in the United States
Emotion Regulation and Psychopathology
Emotion Regulation and Psychopathology
The Relative Performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Missing Data in Structural Equation Models
Fit indices in covariance structure modeling
Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation
The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education
Schooling and Occupational Outcomes in Adults with ADHD
| Highly cited | No |
|---|