Mental health in the construction industry
Vulnerabilities and psychosocial risks among diverse workers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21628145 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew Arena (0000-0002-7105-2911, Black Dog Institute, corresponding author), Daniel Collins (0000-0003-2195-9037, Black Dog Institute), Samuel B Harvey (0000-0001-9580-3743, Black Dog Institute), Mark Deady (0000-0002-5230-2401, Black Dog Institute) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Current Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1046-1310 • E-ISSN: 1936-4733 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12144-026-09121-6 |
| OpenAlex | W7129634163 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
Workers in the construction industry are at heightened risk of mental ill-health and suicide; however, a more nuanced understanding of risk factors is needed to inform prevention efforts. The current study aimed to identify workers most at risk of poor mental health and offer unique insights into both the prevalence and impact of workplace psychosocial risk factors among less commonly examined subgroups of workers. A nationwide survey was conducted with 710 workers from an Australian construction company. Differences in psychological distress (K10) were tested between demographic groups. Both the presence of psychosocial risk factors and their impact on distress were assessed and compared across various occupational roles. Women, younger, part-time/casual, and newer workers were particularly vulnerable to distress. Some of the most prevalent workplace risk factors were also among the most impactful on mental health (job role ambiguity/conflict; lack of job control). Others were less prevalent but highly impactful (bullying/harassment) or highly prevalent but less impactful (high job demands; long hours; lack of reward/recognition). Tradespeople, technical/analytical workers, office workers, and managers were equally at risk of poor mental health; however, each occupational category (and especially tradespeople) appeared disproportionately impacted by particular workplace risk factors. Prevention efforts should focus on particularly vulnerable industry subgroups and target risks with the potential to have the greatest impact. Various occupational groups appear equally in need of preventative action, although such efforts should account for the distinct risks experienced by these groups
Distress · Mental distress · Mental health · Occupational safety and health · Psychological distress · Psychosocial · Risk assessment · Risk factor · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Workplace Health and Well-being · Workplace Violence and Bullying
Can work make you mentally ill? A systematic meta-review of work-related risk factors for common mental health problems
Suicide by occupation
Job demands–resources theory
Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress
The Job Demands‐Resources model
The Utility of a Mental Health App in Apprentice Workers
Can smartphone applications and wearable technologies improve workplace well-being and help manage stress? A systematic review
Examining the effects of tyrannical leadership on workplace incivility
Factors Associated With Workplace Bullying and the Mental Health of Construction Industry Apprentices
How Managers’ Job Crafting Reduces Turnover Intention
The relationship between insomnia symptoms and work productivity among blue-collar and white-collar Japanese workers engaged in construction/civil engineering work
The psychosocial and health effects of workplace reorganisation. 1. A systematic review of organisational-level interventions that aim to increase employee control
Having a thick skin is essential’
When Following the Rules Is Bad for Wellbeing
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |