Proposing a framework for ethical use of AI in academic writing based on a conceptual review
Implications for quality education
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21631313 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mansour Amini (0000-0003-2149-4604, Universiti Sains Malaysia), Kam-Fong Lee (0000-0002-5572-8627, SEGi University), Wang Yiqiu (0009-0004-1603-7489, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University), Wang Yi-qiu (Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, corresponding author), Latha Ravindran (0000-0002-5830-2437, SEGi University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 1394-1418 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Interactive Learning Environments (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-4820 • E-ISSN: 1744-5191 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10494820.2025.2523382 |
| OpenAlex | W4412014521 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 72 |
Aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education), this paper addresses the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in academic writing. While AI tools offer unprecedented opportunities for personalized learning and efficiency, their unregulated use raises significant ethical challenges. Through a systematic conceptual review, this study synthesizes existing ethical frameworks and identifies gaps in practical guidance. It proposes a novel, student-centered framework grounded on four pillars: (1) Validation and Source Verification, ensuring AI-generated content accuracy; (2) Transparency and Acknowledgment, promoting honesty by disclosing AI assistance; (3) Context-Dependent Similarity Index, adopting flexible thresholds for AI content usage depending on the academic context; and (4) Direct Source Linking, encouraging proper citation practices with accessible references. The study advocates for embedding this framework into educational policies and AI literacy curricula to empower students to harness AI responsibly, thereby safeguarding educational quality and fostering a culture of transparency and ethical scholarship
Conceptual framework · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Knowledge management · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Social science · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI · Psychology
Developing students’ feedback literacy in disciplinary academic writing through generative artificial intelligence
The Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Developing Cognitive and Research Talent Among Postgraduate Students
An artificial intelligence application framework for nursing education
Paying the Cognitive Debt
Motivation Terminology in Reading Research
Ethics of AI in Education
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author
ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI
Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom
Designing conceptual articles
Education for AI, not AI for Education
Artificial intelligence in education
The Ethics of AI Ethics
The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay
Opinion Paper
Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus
Promoting an open research culture
Ethics and Privacy in AI and Big Data
Literature review as a research methodology
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society
Intersectionality of social and philosophical frameworks with technology
What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature
Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education
Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism
ChatGPT
The rise of artificial intelligence and robots in the 4th Industrial Revolution
From What to How
Use of ChatGPT in academia
Artificial intelligence for education
Users’ quality expectations and their correspondence with the realistic features of translation applications
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |