Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Unified Mooc utilization model (Umum) for exploring computer-supported learning with educational technology in terms of Mooc utilization in higher education

Bibliographic Data

ID21631478
AuthorsMaimoona Salam (0000-0001-7102-274X, University of Engineering and Technology), Muhammad Shoaib Farooq (0000-0003-3263-2646, University of Engineering and Technology, corresponding author), Mohsin Shahzad (0000-0002-2101-8619, Liaoning Normal University), Azhar Ali (0000-0002-5750-6761, Dalian University of Technology), Saif ur Rehman (0000-0001-8371-4911, University of Management and Technology)
Year2026
Volume34
Issue3
Pages1802-1838
Publication date2026-03-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInteractive Learning Environments (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-4820 • E-ISSN: 1744-5191
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10494820.2025.2530631
OpenAlexW4412878191
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited67

By integrating the two theoretical strands of DeLone & McLean’s IS success model and fit-related constructs of task technology fit model this study puts forward the unified MOOC utilization model (UMUM). The proposed UMUM model also comprises quality and fit variables to explain the students’ intention to re-use MOOCs. Further, UMUM model proposed that the intention to re-use MOOCs ultimately maximizes MOOC’s overall utilization. The UMUM research model was empirically validated by employing the PLS-SEM approach, using data collected from 370 students registered in a MOOC based study program. Findings confirmed that the proposed quality-related factors of the UMUM model (i.e. system, information, service, and ELIQ) and task characteristics positively influence fit factors. Likewise, the association between users’ self-reported satisfaction with MOOC and their intention to re-use it is also positive and significant. Finally, intention to re-use, task-technology fit (i.e. fulfilling the technical expectations of users for their learning tasks), and task-service fit in the UMUM model positively influence and predict overall MOOC utilization. Future studies concerning MOOCs and educational technology can employ the UMUM model for the assessment of MOOC utilization and students’ intention to re-use MOOCs

Educational technology · Higher education · Mathematics education · Multimedia · Political science · Computer Science · Online and Blended Learning · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology · Technology-Enhanced Education Studies

  • Integrated collaborative reflection model (ICRM) Part 1

    Maimoona Salam, Muhammad Shoaib Farooq et al.•Global Knowledge, Memory and…•2026

  • Modern factor analysis

    Harry Horace Harman•Modern factor analysis•1976

  • Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling

    Open Access•J Christopher Westland•Electronic Commerce Research and…•2010

  • Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance

    Dale L Goodhue, Ronald L Thompson•MIS Quarterly•1995

  • Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM

    Open Access•Ned Kock, Pierre Hadaya•Information Systems Journal•2018

  • Continuance intention to use Moocs

    Open Access•Bing Wu, Xiao Hui Chen et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2017

  • Information Systems Success

    William H DeLone, William DeLone et al.•Information Systems Research•1992

  • Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results

    Open Access•Christian M Ringle, Marko Sarstedt•Industrial Management & Data…•2016

  • Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade

    Open Access•Marko Sarstedt, Joseph F Hair et al.•Psychology and Marketing•2022

  • Common Method Bias

    Open Access•Ned Kock•Partial Least Squares Path Modeling•2017

  • Common methods variance detection in business research

    Open Access•Christie M Fuller, Marcia J Simmering et al.•Journal of Business Research•2016

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Open Access•Claes Fornell, David F Larcker•Journal of Marketing Research•1981

  • Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2012

  • Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM

    Open Access•Ned Kock•International Journal of…•2015

  • The measurement and characteristic analysis of learner interaction levels in cMoocs based on path analysis

    Yulin Tian, Jianjun Xiao•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • The effects of the expectation confirmation model (ECM) and the technology acceptance model (TAM) on learning management systems (LMS) in sub-saharan Africa

    Yaser Hasan Al‐Mamary, Yaser Hasan Al-Mamary et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2023

  • How does the type of online peer feedback influence feedback quality, argumentative essay writing quality, and domain-specific learning

    Open Access•Anahuac Valero Haro, Omid Noroozi et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2024

  • Self-regulated learner profiles in Moocs

    Hengtao Tang, Yu Bao•Interactive Learning Environments•2022

  • A systematic review for Mooc dropout prediction from the perspective of machine learning

    Jing Chen, Bei Fang et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2022

  • Why did they come back? Analysis of learning behaviour and motivation of repeat learners in cMoocs

    Lei Xie, Cixiao Wang•Interactive Learning Environments•2024

  • Assessment of digital skills of university Mooc instructors

    Shanwei Lin•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • The evolution of language Moocs in Mainland China

    Xiaojuan Yin, Wulin Ma•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • How do learners’ content network characteristics evolve in cMooc from the perspective of clustering and comparing learners

    Yujuan Guo, Luoying Huang et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • How do learners participate in interaction in different types of discussion topics and learning tools of cMoocs

    Luoying Huang, Yujuan Guo et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2024

  • Precisely identifying and mitigating shallow reading behaviors through online reading data

    Yu Bai, Jun Yi Shi et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2024

  • Assessing the factors affecting users’ behavioural intention to use Moocs

    Musab Alsubaie, Mohammad Y Sarhan et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • Enhancing student engagement and higher-order thinking in human-centred design projects

    Yi-Lin Elim Liu, Tseng-Pin Lee et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • Early prediction of Mooc dropout in self-paced students using deep learning

    Xiao Wen, Juan Hu et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2024

  • Effects of sentiment discreteness on Moocs’ disconfirmation

    Wei Wang, Haiwang Liu et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory

    Open Access•Thomas K F Chiu•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Service learning in higher education

    Open Access•Maimoona Salam, D N F Awang Iskandar et al.•Asia Pacific Education Review•2019

  • Travel web-site design

    Open Access•Adenekan Dedeke•Tourism Management•2016

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae