Generative AI in Self-Directed Learning
A thematic scoping review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21632373 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jasper Roe (0000-0001-7489-2847, Durham University, corresponding author), Mike Perkins (0000-0002-4479-4565, British University Vietnam) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-12 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Interactive Learning Environments (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-4820 • E-ISSN: 1744-5191 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10494820.2025.2603431 |
| OpenAlex | W7117371607 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 68 |
This thematic scoping review examines and analyses the current body of knowledge at the intersection of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and Self-Directed Learning (SDL). An exhaustive search strategy was used to identify 18 relevant studies published from 2020 to 2024 (N = 18). These studies were analysed using an inductive thematic analytical approach, leading to the development of four themes that typify the current field of research. This includes GenAI as a Potential Enhancement for SDL, The Educator as a GenAI Guide, Personalisation of Learning, and Approaching with Caution. Our findings suggest that GenAI tools, including ChatGPT and other Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in potentially supporting SDL through on-demand, personalised assistance. At the same time, the literature emphasises that educators are as important and central to the learning process as ever before, although their role may continue to shift as technologies develop. Our review reveals that there are still significant gaps in understanding the long-term impacts of GenAI on SDL outcomes, and there is a further need for longitudinal empirical studies that explore not only text-based chatbots but also emerging multimodal applications
Generative grammar · Generative model · Qualitative research · Thematic analysis · Thematic map · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching
Technology Acceptance, Technological Self-Efficacy, and Attitude Toward Technology-Based Self-Directed Learning
Self-Directed Learning
Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era
Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education
Chatting and cheating
Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning
A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education
Thematic analysis
Toward good practice in thematic analysis
Generative AI as Cultural Artifact
The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education
The potential for digital technology to support self-directed learning in formal education of children
Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
There is more than ‘I’ in self-directed learning
Enhancing self-directed learning with custom GPT AI facilitation among medical students
State of the art and practice in AI in education
Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta‐analysis
ChatGPT is bullshit
Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
The AI Assessment Scale (Aias) in action
Factors related to college students’ self-directed learning with technology
Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence
Validity matters more than cheating
ChatGPT
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Fostering self-directed learning in the university setting
Generative AI
Danish university policies on generative AI
| Citations per year | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |