Using Communication Privacy Management Theory to Explore undocumented/Daca Status Disclosure in College Students
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21633334 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Belén Gamiño (San Diego State University), Scott C Roesch (0000-0001-6574-1916, San Diego State University), Allison A Vaughn (0000-0001-8454-9284, San Diego State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 77 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 614-632 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Communication Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1051-0974 • E-ISSN: 1745-1035 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10510974.2025.2532498 |
| OpenAlex | W4412421417 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 31 |
Actively concealing private information is psychologically taxing and can be detrimental to health, whereas disclosing certain kinds of private information may result in legal and financial consequences. The current study examined college students’ disclosure of their undocumented immigration status through the lens of Communication Privacy Management (CPM) Theory. Participants (N = 118; 52% women) were college students recruited through student resource and cultural identity centers as well as through social media. Students were at least 18 years of age (M = 23), enrolled at a 2-year or 4-year college/university, able to read and respond to online surveys in English, and self-identified as being undocumented (62%) or holding DACA status (33%). Participants took an online survey using Qualtrics software and completed the Communication Privacy Management Scale (risk, coordination, ownership, and emotional response subscales). Confirmatory factor analysis suggested a 5-factor solution best fit the data (i.e. risk, coordination, ownership, upsetting emotions, relieved emotions). Path analyses showed most of the CPM subscales related to each other in theoretically meaningful ways for upsetting emotions but not for relieved emotions. Contrary to theory, ownership was not related to risk or boundary coordination. The current study provides partial support for the use of CPM as an appropriate framework from which to analyze the disclosure of immigration status for undocumented college students on their campus. Understanding the relationship among the CPM variables allows for a nuanced understanding of how students navigate disclosure of undocumented immigration status, and future studies could explore the health and wellbeing consequences of disclosure
Higher education · Political science · Sociology · Law · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Psychology · Social Psychology
Conceptualization and operationalization
Barriers to health care for undocumented immigrants
On tests and indices for evaluating structural models
The Health of Undocumented Latinx Immigrants
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Discovering One’s Undocumented Immigration Status through Family Disclosures
Managing Illegality on Campus
Boundaries of Privacy
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification
Coming out
Undocufriendly ≠ undocuserving
Latino immigrant men and the deportation crisis
Communication Privacy Management and Pregnancy Loss in Interpersonal Workplace Communication
Comparative fit indexes in structural models
The Impact of Detention and Deportation on Latino Immigrant Children and Families
Legal Consciousness of Undocumented Latinos
No Place to Belong
Family and Friends as Healthcare Advocates
Privacy rules for revealing one's undocumented status to nonfamily members
To Reveal or Conceal
Multigenerational Punishment
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |