Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

All together now

Random Forests analysis reveals the joint impact of multiple statistical regularities on eye-movements during reading

Bibliographic Data

ID21640469
AuthorsInbal Kimchi (0000-0002-2553-7117, Hebrew University of Jerusalem), Noam Siegelman (0000-0002-5005-4838, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume33
Issue1
Pages17-17
Publication date2026-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychonomic Bulletin & Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1069-9384 • E-ISSN: 1531-5320
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3758/s13423-025-02829-9
PMID41402589
OpenAlexW4417405603
LanguageEN
References cited62

A large and growing number of recent studies has embraced a statistical learning view of reading, revealing that readers utilize an array of regularities that are available in writing systems as they process printed words and texts. However, previous studies have focused on the impact of one regularity (or an otherwise small number of cues). Therefore, we currently have a limited understanding of (1) whether different regularities each carry unique explanatory power, beyond other (collinear) cues; (2) how do regularities at different levels of the input contribute to reading behavior; and (3) whether regularities vary in their contributions across processing stages. To answer these questions, we employ Random Forests analyses on a large-scale, eye-movement, passage-reading database from English first- and second-language readers, evaluating the relative importance of a large number of regularities on multiple eye-movement dependent variables. First, our findings demonstrate that, each regularity uniquely contributes to the model’s performance. Second, we show that both text-level regularities (e.g., predictability) and word-level regularities (including print-speech and print-meaning regularities), contribute to continuous text reading. Third, we document varying contributions of some regularities over time, with later reading measures being more impacted by text-level regularities. These results support and extend statistical learning theories of reading, showing that readers are attuned to a range of regularities in their writing system, which jointly guide naturalistic reading behavior

Statistical Learning · Statistical model · Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology · Reading and Literacy Development · Text Readability and Simplification

  • OB1-reader

    Open Access•Joshua Snell, Sam van Leipsig et al.•Psychological Review•2018

  • Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information

    Open Access•Piotr Bojanowski, Edouard Grave et al.•Transactions of the Association…•2017

  • An introduction to recursive partitioning

    Carolin Strobl, James D Malley et al.•Psychological Methods•2009

  • Computing the Meanings of Words in Reading

    Michael W Harm, Mark S Seidenberg•Psychological Review•2004

  • Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition

    Kathleen Rastle, Matthew H Davis et al.•Language and Cognitive Processes•2000

  • Understanding normal and impaired word reading

    David C Plaut, James L Mcclelland et al.•Psychological Review•1996

  • Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas

    Open Access•Marc Brysbaert, Amy Beth Warriner et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2014

  • “Cloze Procedure”

    Open Access•Wilson L Taylor•Journalism Quarterly•1953

  • Learning to Read Words

    Linnea C Ehri•Scientific Studies of Reading•2005

  • Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words

    Open Access•Victor Kuperman, Hans Stadthagen-Gonzalez et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2012

  • Variable selection using random forests

    Open Access•Robin Genuer, Jean‐michel Poggi et al.•Pattern Recognition Letters•2010

  • Towards a universal model of reading

    Open Access•Ram Frost•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2012

  • Conditional variable importance for random forests

    Open Access•Carolin Strobl, Anne-Laure Boulesteix et al.•BMC Bioinformatics•2008

  • The English Lexicon Project

    Open Access•David A Balota, Melvin J Yap et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

    Mark S Seidenberg, James L Mcclelland•Psychological Review•1989

  • Bias in random forest variable importance measures

    Open Access•Carolin Strobl, Anne-Laure Boulesteix et al.•BMC Bioinformatics•2007

  • Random Forests

    Open Access•Leo Breiman•Machine Learning•2001

  • Word Frequency and Predictability Dissociate in Naturalistic Reading

    Open Access•Cory Shain•Open MIND•2024

  • Prediction at the intersection of sentence context and word form

    Open Access•Simona Amenta, Jana Hasenäcker et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2023

  • A story about statistical learning in a story

    Open Access•Joshua Snell, Jules Theeuwes et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2020

  • Number and syllabification of following consonants influence use of long versus short vowels in English disyllables

    Open Access•Rebecca Treiman, Brett Kessler et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2023

  • Individual differences in learning the regularities between orthography, phonology and semantics predict early reading skills

    Open Access•Noam Siegelman, Jay G Rueckl et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2020

  • Text reading in English as a second language

    Open Access•Victor Kuperman, Noam Siegelman et al.•Studies in Second Language…•2023

  • Individual Differences in L2 Literacy Acquisition

    Open Access•Henry Brice, Noam Siegelman et al.•Studies in Second Language…•2022

  • The Effect of Lexical Predictability on Eye Movements in Reading

    Open Access•Adrian Staub•Language and Linguistics Compass•2015

  • Models, forests, and trees of York English

    Open Access•Sali A Tagliamonte, R Harald Baayen•Language Variation and Change•2012

  • Eye movements in reading and information processing

    Keith Rayner•Psychological Bulletin•1998

  • Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition

    Ram Frost•Psychological Bulletin•1998

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae