A meta-analysis of event-related potential correlates of recognition memory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21640647 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Simon Kwon, Michael D Rugg (0000-0002-0397-5749), Ronny Wiegand, Tim Curran (0000-0003-4689-8306), Alexa M Morcom (0000-0003-4654-5308) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 2083-2105 |
| Publication date | 2023-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1069-9384 • E-ISSN: 1531-5320 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3758/s13423-023-02309-y |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 134 |
A longstanding question in memory research is whether recognition is supported by more than one mnemonic process. Dual-process models distinguish recollection of episodic detail from familiarity, while single-process models explain recognition in terms of one process that varies in strength. Dual process models have drawn support from findings that recollection and familiarity elicit distinct electroencephalographic event-related potentials (ERPs): a mid-frontal ERP effect that occurs at around 300–500 ms post-stimulus onset and is often larger for familiarity than recollection contrasts, and a parietal ERP effect that occurs at around 500–800 ms and is larger for recollection than familiarity contrasts. We sought to adjudicate between dual- and single-process models by investigating whether the dissociation between these two ERP effects is reliable over studies. We extracted effect sizes from 41 experiments that had used Remember-Know, source memory, and associative memory paradigms (1,000 participants). Meta-analysis revealed a strong interaction between ERP effect and mnemonic process of the form predicted by dual-process models. Although neither ERP effect was significantly process-selective taken alone, a moderator analysis revealed a larger mid-frontal effect for familiarity than recollection contrasts in studies using the Remember-Know paradigm. Mega-analysis of raw data from six studies further showed significant process-selectivity for both mid-frontal and parietal ERPs in the predicted time windows. On balance, the findings favor dual- over single-process theories of recognition memory, but point to a need to promote sharing of raw data
Ggplot2
Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
Recollection and familiarity
Recognizing
Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper)
Event-related potentials and recognition memory
Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Memory and consciousness.
Regression Methods to Detect Publication and Other Bias in Meta‐Analysis
Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.
Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory
Open Science Framework (OSF)
Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression
Raincloud plots
A process dissociation framework
Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
BRMS
The Fair Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
Noncriterial Recollection
Measuring recollection and familiarity
Source monitoring
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |