Scrolling to wisdom
The impact of social media news exposure on knowledge perception
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21640998 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Federica Ruzzante (0009-0008-0232-905X, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, corresponding author), Gustavo Cevolani (0000-0001-8770-8877, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca), Folco Panizza (0000-0001-5178-5926, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 11-11 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1069-9384 • E-ISSN: 1531-5320 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3758/s13423-025-02786-3 |
| PMID | 41369854 |
| OpenAlex | W4417196134 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 28 |
The present study explores the effect of exposure to news in a social media environment on people’s perceived knowledge and on the “Illusion of knowledge” —that is, the overestimation of perceived knowledge relative to actual knowledge. Using a mixed, within-subjects design, participants ( N = 828) engaged in a two-session study featuring pre- and post-exposure assessments. Participants scrolled through a social media newsfeed and completed assessments of perceived and actual knowledge. We hypothesized that (1) social media exposure would increase perceived knowledge, (2) this increase would not align with actual knowledge, and (3) higher topic involvement would exacerbate these effects. While most of the preregistered hypotheses did not receive clear statistical support, some effects were consistent with our predictions. Perceived knowledge increased over time, suggesting a general exposure effect; however, differences between exposed and non-exposed topics were not statistically significant, possibly due to test effects or limited engagement with the platform. A strong illusion of knowledge was observed across topics, suggesting robust overestimation. This high baseline may have created a ceiling that constrained the detection of exposure effects. This study was conducted as a Registered Report ( https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.rr.100986 ), accepted in principle prior to data collection. To our knowledge, it represents one of the most ecologically valid attempts in the literature to simulate social media exposure in an experimental setting
Ceiling effect · Perception · Scrolling · Social media · Social perception · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Social Media and Politics
The misunderstood limits of folk science
Is Facebook Making Us Dumber? Exploring Social Media Use as a Predictor of Political Knowledge
The simulation heuristic
Do Social Networking Sites Influence Well-Being? The Extended Active-Passive Model
Illusion of knowledge through Facebook news? Effects of snack news in a news feed on perceived knowledge, attitude strength, and willingness for discussions
Online and (the feeling of being) informed
‘I saw it on Facebook’
The Feeling of Knowing
Political Extremism Is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding
How others drive our sense of understanding of policies
A little bit of knowledge
Political News in the News Feed
Probing the Mechanisms Through Which Social Media Erodes Political Knowledge
Effects of the News-Finds-Me Perception in Communication
The need for cognition
Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most
How behavioural sciences can promote truth, autonomy and democratic discourse online
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Explanation Fiends and Foes
| Highly cited | No |
|---|