“Paddy pointed his pseudo-liberal finger at us”
An analysis of civilian public diplomacy films following the 2023 Hamas terror attack
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21642002 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elie Friedman (0000-0003-1235-9136, Ashkelon Academic College, corresponding author), Ayelet Kohn (0000-0002-0871-4492, David Yellin College of Education) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 325-355 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Communication Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1071-4421 • E-ISSN: 1547-7487 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10714421.2025.2524988 |
| OpenAlex | W4411833447 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 64 |
This study engages in multimodal semiotic analysis of six citizen-produced public diplomacy films, from a corpus of 56 films, created in wake of the October 7th Hamas terrorist attack on Southwestern Israel, following the perceived failure of official public diplomacy efforts. Utilizing multimodal semiotic analysis, this study illustrates how such films employ the richness of multimodal communicative acts, that is textual speech acts combined with visual and aural communication, to “do” something in the world. The study examines multimodal communicative acts that express feelings of betrayal, while attempting to elicit a range of audience emotions. Furthermore, the study illustrates how these films utilize double articulations to engage in condemnation and blame, in which specific audiences are called out for hypocrisy or obtuseness, while broader audiences are challenged to join the in-group in solidarity by taking action. The study illustrates how multimodal communicative acts in public diplomacy situations can serve as a unique tool that civilians employ in complex public diplomacy situations, employing a rich interplay among modalities to produce various perlocutionary effects, such as the facilitation of solidarity, the mobilization of support and calls to action, and the elicitation of shame, while implying that indifference is comparable to betrayal
Computer security · Diplomacy · Political science · Politics · Public Diplomacy · Computer Science · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Rhetoric and Communication Studies
The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy
Affective Publics
Introducing Social Semiotics
Film/Genre
Multimodality
The Hybrid Media System
The Blame Game
Battles to Bridges
Bodies in action
Against Online Public Shaming
Communicating with the World
Making Sense of Media and Politics
Social Media – An Arena for Venting Negative Emotions
Digitalization of public diplomacy
Revisiting public diplomacy in a postpandemic world
Hasbara 2.0
Digital Diplomacy 2.0? A Cross-national Comparison of Public Engagement in Facebook and Twitter
Israel’s New Peer-to-Peer Diplomacy
Public Diplomacy in the Digital Age
Values, Identity, and Israel Advocacy
Mapping the transnational imaginary of social media genres
Public Diplomacy
Pinkwashing
Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC
The age of apology
Discursive legitimation strategies
Why do People Blame Victims of Abuse? The Role of Stereotypes of Women on Perceptions of Blame
Solemn and just demands’
Rethinking media responsibility in the refugee ‘crisis’
Bearing witness, journalism and moral responsibility
Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy
Public Diplomacy and Soft Power
Public Diplomacy
Between the nation and the profession
Tabloid journalism and the public sphere
The ‘blame game frame
The rhetoric of public diplomacy and propaganda wars
Representation, recognition and foreign policy in the Iran–US relationship
Parables for the Virtual
An Emotional Turn in Journalism Studies
Siege mentality in Israel
Political speech acts in contrast
Scaling Social Movements Through Social Media
Visualizing the Paris Climate Talks on Twitter
Digitally Mediated Protest
Making a Difference
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |