Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Utilizing Primary Care to Engage Patients on Opioids in a Psychological Intervention for Chronic Pain

Bibliographic Data

ID21645713
AuthorsLisa R Miller-Matero (0000-0002-7044-7831, Behavioral Health, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA, corresponding author), Sikander Chohan (0000-0003-2168-8142, Wayne State University), Lyubov Gavrilova (Henry Ford Health System), Leah M Hecht (0000-0002-9343-112X, Henry Ford Health System), Kirsti Autio (Henry Ford Health System), Erin T Tobin (0009-0004-9704-943X, Behavioral Health, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA), Brian K Ahmedani (0000-0003-4291-4516, Behavioral Health, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA)
Year2022
Volume57
Issue9
Pages1492-1496
Publication date2022-07-29
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSubstance Use & Misuse (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1082-6084 • E-ISSN: 1532-2491
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10826084.2022.2096239
PMID35786298
OpenAlexW4283803874
LanguageEN
References cited25

INTRODUCTION: Given the risks of opioids for pain management, we need nonpharmacological interventions that patients will engage in and that can reduce opioid use. The purpose was to examine whether offering a psychological intervention in primary care can engage patients receiving opioids for pain management and to explore whether the intervention influences opioid use. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a 5-session psychological intervention in primary care for chronic pain. Patients with chronic pain (N = 220) were approached to enroll in the RCT. Electronic health records were reviewed to determine whether patients were prescribed opioids or pain medications at the time they were approached about the RCT and the 6-months following the intervention. RESULTS: Enrollees and non-enrollees had similar rates of opioid prescriptions, morphine milligram equivalent dose of opioids, and rates of other pain medication prescriptions (p> .05). However, no males with an opioid prescription enrolled. Though not significant, those in the intervention had lower odds of having an opioid prescription 6 months following the intervention (p= .09, OR= .32). Those randomized to the intervention had lower odds of having a non-opioid pain medication prescription (p= .01, OR= .17). CONCLUSIONS: Having an opioid prescription did not interfere with enrollment, suggesting that primary care may be useful for engaging patients on opioids in a psychological treatment for chronic pain. However, this may be true for women, and not men. This intervention also showed promise for decreasing opioid use and warrants further study

Chronic pain · Logistic regression · Medical prescription · Odds · Odds ratio · Opioid · Physical therapy · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Randomized controlled trial · Medicine · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Nursing · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment · Pain Management and Opioid Use · Internal Medicine

  • A Meta-analysis of Gender Differences in Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help

    Suk Kyung Nam, Hui Jung Chu et al.•Journal of American College Health•2010

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness for chronic pain

    Lance M Mccracken, Kevin E Vowles•American Psychologist•2014

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae