Building Sustainable Ecological Barriers Through Ecosystem Synergies and Socio‐Ecological Integration
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21648105 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Xiao-Yu Hu (Inner Mongolia University), Hu Xiaoyu (School of Ethnology and Sociology Inner Mongolia University Hohhot Inner Mongolia China), Yu Cuiying (0009-0002-3125-7653, College of Humanities and Social Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University Hohhot Inner Mongolia China, autor de correspondencia), Han Yiying (College of Humanities and Social Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University Hohhot Inner Mongolia China) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Volumen | 37 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 43-57 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-01-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Land Degradation and Development (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/ldr.70093 |
| OpenAlex | W4412880614 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 59 |
The sustainability of ecological barriers is critical in addressing the escalating challenges of land degradation and ecosystem degradation, both of which threaten biodiversity and the socio‐ecological system. This study proposes an integrated decision‐support framework that combines fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to systematically identify, evaluate, and prioritize the barriers hindering ecological barrier sustainability, as well as to assess effective strategies to overcome them. According to the fuzzy AHP results, financial and economic barriers emerged as the most critical, highlighting key challenges such as inadequate public funding, limited access to green finance, and substantial upfront investment requirements. Institutional and governance barriers ranked second, primarily due to fragmented policy frameworks, overlapping institutional mandates, and weak regulatory enforcement. Technical and infrastructural barriers were identified as the third most significant, driven by deficiencies in ecological monitoring systems, insufficient integration of digital technologies, and limited capacity for implementing nature‐based solutions. In parallel, the fuzzy TOPSIS analysis identified the adoption of climate‐smart and adaptive management approaches, expansion of ecological monitoring and digital tools, and integrated land use planning and zoning as the most effective strategies for overcoming these barriers
Biology · Business · Ecosystem · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Sustainable development · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Environmental Conservation and Management · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Ecology
Principles for Building Resilience
Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Cultivated Ecosystem Services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
The global cost of international commitments on land restoration
Dynamic interactions and mechanisms between high‐quality urbanization and ecosystem service value in Shandong Province
Sustainability of crop–based biodiesel for transportation in China
Integrating green infrastructure, ecosystem services and nature-based solutions for urban sustainability
The impact of green finance policy on land ecological security
Achieving the promise of integration in social-ecological research
Considering land use complexity and overlap is critical for sustainability planning
Insouciant, powerless or helpless
Do economic incentives crowd out motivation for communal land conservation in Ethiopia
A multi‐methods approach for assessing how conserving biodiversity interacts with other sustainable development goals in Nepal
Why is ecological sustainability so difficult to achieve? An in‐context discussion of conceptual barriers
Resilience in the face of ecological challenges
Understanding and evaluating the resilience of rural human settlements with a social-ecological system framework
Ipbes, 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
Reversing degradation of social–ecological systems
From sustainable development to social-ecological justice
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |