Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Optimal straw management co‐benefits crop yield and soil carbon sequestration of intensive farming systems

Bibliographic Data

ID21648195
AuthorsLiang Wang (0009-0009-7673-7272, National Engineering Research Center for Wheat and Maize and Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences Jinan PR China), Enli Wang (0000-0002-6653-5791, CSIRO Agriculture and Food Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia), Xin Qian (0000-0002-4889-0319, National Engineering Research Center for Wheat and Maize and Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences Jinan PR China), Yingbo Gao (National Engineering Research Center for Wheat and Maize and Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences Jinan PR China), Hui Zhang (0000-0002-8814-226X, National Engineering Research Center for Wheat and Maize and Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences Jinan PR China), Zongxin Li (0000-0003-3758-9544, National Engineering Research Center for Wheat and Maize and Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences Jinan PR China, corresponding author), Kaichang Liu (National Engineering Research Center for Wheat and Maize and Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences Jinan PR China)
Year2023
Volume34
Issue8
Pages2322-2333
Publication date2023-05-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Degradation and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1085-3278 • E-ISSN: 1099-145X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ldr.4610
OpenAlexW4316041929
LanguageEN
References cited40

Straw retention has been widely recommended to sequester more soil organic carbon (SOC) in agricultural soils, while carbon sequestration may not respond linearly to additional carbon input amount. The response of SOC, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and economic income to different straw management methods in intensive wheat‐maize double cropping systems still need systematical study. An 8‐year field experiment was conducted in the Huang‐Huai‐Hai Plain to investigate the impacts of optimal straw management (wheat straw was all crushed and spread on the soil surface, maize straw was all crushed and returned t into 0‐15 cm soil layer) and optimal straw management (wheat straw was all crushed and spread on the soil surface , while maize straw was all harvested for feed) on SOC sequestrations, carbon economy and economic income. The results showed that only returning wheat straw into the field could maintain a similar crop yield (15.0 Mg ha −1 ) and SOC sequestration amount (9.06 Mg C ha −1 ) to the conventional straw management method. While this optimal straw management method kept a stable SOC sequestration rate of 1.24 Mg ha −1 yr −1 when the SOC sequestration rate decreased from 1.76 to 1.20 Mg ha −1 yr −1 in the conventional method. The optimal management method also further reduced GHG emissions by 85.4% and using maize straw as stock feed increased net income by 28.3%. Only returning wheat straw could realize economic and environmental benefits win‐win in the wheat‐maize double cropping systems, which provides important background knowledge about safe and sustainable agriculture

Agriculture · Agronomy · Biology · Carbon dioxide · Carbon sequestration · Crop · Crop residue · Cropping system · Greenhouse gas · Soil carbon · Soil water · Straw · Bioenergy crop production and management · Chemistry · Environmental Science · Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics · Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics · Ecology · Soil Science

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae