Identifying the Facilitators and Barriers in Disseminating and Adopting a Health Intervention Developed by a Community–Academic Partnership

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21650645
AutoresTruely Harding (0000-0002-3391-3928, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, autor correspondente), John Oetzel (0000-0003-3188-776X, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand), Mary Simpson (University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand), Mary Louisa Simpson (0000-0002-3915-4897, University of Waikato), Sophie Nock (0000-0002-6588-1158, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand)
Ano2022
Volume49
Fascículo4
Páginas724-731
Data de publicação2022-08-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoHealth Education & Behavior (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1090-1981 • E-ISSN: 1552-6127
EditoraSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/10901981211033228
PMID34697952
OpenAlexW3209137962
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas22

The literature regarding implementation science of evidence-based health interventions in Māori communities is limited, and there is a push for new and innovative delivery methods of health interventions in New Zealand. The purpose of the study was to identify the facilitators and barriers in implementing a health intervention designed by others and was framed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). This study explored general perceptions of the implementation process and also included a case study, the Kaumātua Mana Motuhake (older people’s autonomy and self-actualization) project; a codesigned peer education intervention for older Māori. Semistructured interviews ( N = 17) were conducted via face-to-face, phone, or Zoom with health and social service professionals with experience working with Māori communities. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. The facilitators included community engagement, program structure, program adaptability and creators’ experience. The barriers consisted of funding access, funding constraints and organizational constraints. The findings support key elements within the CFIR, highlighting the importance of community engagement and adaptability. Additionally, this study identified nuanced aspects of funding and resources that constrain organisations in employing health interventions designed by others

General partnership · Health promotion · Implementation research · Medical education · Peer support · Political science · Psychological intervention · Public health · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Community Health and Development · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Psychology