Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An exploratory study of epistemic stance in results and discussion sections of medical research articles

Bibliographic Data

ID21679040
AuthorsZeynep Nur DOĞAN (0000-0003-4886-0440, Erciyes University), Erdem Akbaş (0000-0003-2204-3119, Erciyes University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume25
Issue3
Pages1132-1150
Publication date2021-09-28
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAtatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1304-4990 • E-ISSN: 2717-6568
PublisherAtaturk Universitesi (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.53487/ataunisosbil.951126
OpenAlexW3202780249
LanguageEN
References cited16

This study is a corpus-based investigation of how epistemic stance is signaled in medical discourse. In particular, we compiled a discipline-specific corpus of research articles from different fields of medicine ranging from anatomy to endocrinology to explore how particular resources are employed by authors to index their level of (un)certainty towards their propositions. The corpus of the study contained only the results and discussion sections of 100 published medical research articles, totaling approximately 215,000 words. The results of the corpus analyses showed that there was very frequent use of modal auxiliaries by the writers in the field of medicine to express their extra-propositional modality. It was also found that medical researchers did not employ a greater number of boosters to amplify their commitment to the propositions conveyed to the readers. However, the rhetorical uses of boosters were shown to be strategic to portray their higher level of confidence for the sake of credibility and interaction. The findings and implications are discussed with a particular focus on the teaching of writing as a part of English for academic purposes

Academic writing · Certainty · Credibility · Epistemic modality · Epistemology · Exploratory research · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Rhetorical question · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Artificial Intelligence

  • Bundles in Academic Discourse

    Open Access•Ken Hyland•Annual Review of Applied…•2012

  • Evaluation in Text

    Geoffrey Thompson, Susan Hunston et al.•Evaluation in text•2000

  • Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge

    K Hyland•Third Text•1998

  • Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance

    Open Access•K Hyland, Feng Jiang et al.•Written Communication•2016

  • Stance in spoken and written university registers

    Open Access•Douglas Biber•Journal of English for Academic…•2006

  • Beyond modality and hedging

    Peter R White, P R R White•Third Text•2003

  • Styles of stance in English

    Douglas Biber, Edward Finegan•Third Text•1989

  • Longman grammar of spoken and written English

    Douglas Biber•Longman grammar of spoken and…•1999

  • Evidentiality

    Johanna Nichols, Wallace L Chafe•Evidentiality•1986

  • Adverbial stance types in English

    Douglas Biber, Edward Finegan•Discourse Processes•1988

  • Language has a heart

    Elinor Ochs, Bambi B Schieffelin et al.•Third Text•1989

  • Stance and engagement

    Open Access•K Hyland•Discourse Studies•2005

  • Politeness

    Open Access•Penelope Brown, C Levinson et al.•Politeness•1987

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae