The Impact of Positive Peer Feedback on Second Language Writing Accuracy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21680338 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Parisa YEGANEHPOUR (0000-0003-2982-9085, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, corresponding author), Elham ZARFSAZ (0000-0002-6172-6388, Urmia Azad Üniversitesi) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 16 Issue 1 |
| Issue | 16 Issue 1 |
| Pages | 409-426 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Turkish Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1308-2140 • E-ISSN: 1308-2140 |
| Publisher | İntaç Eğitim Danışmanlık Organizasyon Araştırma İnşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Şirketi (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.7827/turkishstudies.47713 |
| OpenAlex | W3132744696 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 12 |
The current study aimed to compare the effects of direct focused peer feedback vs. direct focused teacher feedback types on writing accuracy of Turkish EFL students with regard to tense uptake. For this purpose, 58 students within the age range of 18 to 21 were selected from foreign language school in Agri, Turkey to take part in the current study on 2019. After homogenizing the participants using the Nelson English language test, the classes were randomly set as experimental groups. Before starting the treatment in direct focused peer feedback groups and direct focused teacher feedback groups, in order to compare the performance of the participants at the beginning of the study with their performance at the end, participants of all groups took a writing pretest. In direct focused teacher feedback group, the learners were asked to write their essays on a piece of paper out of class and hand them to the teacher in the class every session. The teacher collected the writings, provided direct focused feedback on grammatical errors with regard to verb tenses, and gave them back to the learners while in the other group the teacher modeled how to give feedback and divided the students into subgroups of 6 students. In each subgroup, the students were supposed to write their essays on a piece of paper out of class. Then, students were expected to read, provide direct focused feedback, and give them back to the owners the following session. After giving the post-test to the participants, the data were analyzed. The comparison of pre and post-test results indicated that direct focused peer corrective feedback had a significant effect on learners’ writing accuracy. Furthermore, the findings of the study showed that the direct focused teacher corrective feedback also had a significant effect on improving learners’ writing accuracy during the treatment period. Further investigation of the results clarified that direct focused peer corrective feedback had a greater improving effect on EFL learners’ writing accuracy in comparison to direct focused teacher corrective feedback
Education Practices and Challenges · Educational Methods and Analysis · Psychology · Writing and Handwriting Education
Teaching by Principles, Second Edition
Implicit and Explicit Corrective Feedback and the Acquisition of L2 Grammar
Reducing Composition Errors
Diagnostic and Developmental Potentials of Dynamic Assessment for L2 writing
The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance
Feedback on second language students' writing
Developing Second-Language Skills
Second Language Teaching and Learning
Effects on Second Language Learning of Variations in Written Feedback on Homework Assignments
The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners' Acquisition of Articles
Differing perceptions in the feedback process
The Effect of Six Different Corrective Feedback Strategies on Iranian English Language Learners' IELTS Writing Task 2
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |