Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Predicting individual differences in conflict detection and bias susceptibility during reasoning

Bibliographic Data

ID21689165
AuthorsJakub Šrol (0000-0002-1168-2639, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia;, corresponding author), Wim De Neys (0000-0003-0917-8852, Paris Descartes University, LaPsyDE (UMR CNRS 8240), Paris, France)
Year2021
Volume27
Issue1
Pages38-68
Publication date2021-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThinking & Reasoning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1354-6783 • E-ISSN: 1464-0708
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13546783.2019.1708793
OpenAlexW3005071731
LanguageEN
Citations received18
References cited41

A key component of the susceptibility to cognitive biases is the ability to monitor for conflict between intuitively cued “heuristic” answers and logical principles. While there is evidence that people differ in their ability to detect such conflicts, it is not clear which factors are driving these differences. In the present study (N = 399) we explored cognitive ability, thinking dispositions, numeracy, cognitive reflection, and mindware instantiation (i.e., knowledge of logical principles) as predictors of individual differences in conflict detection and accuracy on a battery of reasoning problems. Results showed that mindware instantiation was the best predictor of both conflict detection efficiency and reasoning accuracy. Cognitive reflection, thinking dispositions, numeracy, and cognitive ability played a significant but smaller role. The regression model explained 40% of the variance in reasoning accuracy, but only 7% in detection efficiency. We discuss the implications of these findings for popular process models of bias susceptibility

Cognition · Cognitive bias · Cognitive psychology · Debiasing · Heuristic · Literacy · Logical reasoning · Mathematics education · Numeracy · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Thinking in a foreign language distorts allocation of cognitive effort

    Open Access•Michal Bialek, Rafał Muda et al.•Cognition•2020

  • Recognizing biased reasoning

    Open Access•Eva M Janssen, Samuël B Velinga et al.•Acta Psychologica•2021

  • The heuristics-and-biases inventory

    Open Access•Vincent Berthet, Vincent De Gardelle•Frontiers in Psychology•2023

  • Conflict detection across various probabilistic reasoning tasks

    Rowan Haen, Eva M Janssen et al.•European Journal of Cognitive…•2026

  • A validation of the Pseudoscience Endorsement Scale and assessment of the cognitive correlates of pseudoscientific beliefs

    Open Access•Myriam N Torres, I Barberia et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • Limits of the foreign language effect

    Michal Bialek, Artur Domurat et al.•Thinking & Reasoning•2022

  • Who detects and why

    Nikola Erceg, Zvonimir Galić et al.•Thinking & Reasoning•2023

  • What it takes to change your mind

    Veronika Kosourikhina, Simon J Handley•Thinking & Reasoning•2026

  • Open-minded and reflective thinking predicts reasoning and meta-reasoning

    Henry W Strudwicke, Glen E Bodner et al.•Thinking & Reasoning•2024

  • Individual differences in epistemically suspect beliefs

    Jakub Šrol•Thinking & Reasoning•2022

  • Belief bias, conflict detection, and logical complexity

    Open Access•Jianyong Yang, Zhujing Hu et al.•Current Psychology•2024

  • Who benefits from debiasing

    Open Access•Esther Boissin, Gordon Pennycook•Cognition•2025

  • Conflict detection and base-rate extremity

    Open Access•Jianyong Yang, Zhujing Hu et al.•Acta Psychologica•2023

  • Intuition in Decision Making

    Open Access•Tianqi Hu, Ilkka Leppänen et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2025

  • Conflict Detection and Figure Effect in Three‐Model Syllogisms

    Open Access•Jianyong Yang, Ping Lü et al.•Japanese Psychological Research•2026

  • Seeing thought in the future

    Open Access•José Morais, Régine Kolinsky•Journal of Cultural Cognitive…•2021

  • Differences in decisions affected by cognitive biases

    Open Access•Regis K Kakinohana, Ronaldo Pilati•Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica•2023

  • How scientific reasoning correlates with health-related beliefs and behaviors during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Vladimíra Čavojová, Jakub Šrol et al.•Journal of Health Psychology•2022

  • The Rationality Quotient

    Keith E Stanovich, Richard F West et al.•Rationality Quotient•2016

  • Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test

    Open Access•Angela Fagerlin, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher et al.•Medical Decision Making•2007

  • Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking

    Open Access•Wim De Neys, Tamara Glumicic•Cognition•2008

  • Extensional versus intuitive reasoning

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Psychological Review•1983

  • Miserliness in human cognition

    Keith E Stanovich•Thinking & Reasoning•2018

  • What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement

    Open Access•Gordon Pennycook, David Rand et al.•Cognitive Psychology•2015

  • Measuring Risk Literacy

    Open Access•Edward T Cokely, M Galesic et al.•Judgment and Decision Making•2012

  • Bias and Conflict

    Open Access•Wim De Neys•Perspectives on Psychological…•2012

  • Logic, Fast and Slow

    Open Access•Wim De Neys, Gordon Pennycook•Current Directions in Psychological…•2019

  • The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks

    Open Access•Maggie E Toplak, Richard F West et al.•Memory & Cognition•2011

  • Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test

    Open Access•Keela S Thomson, Daniel M Oppenheimer•Judgment and Decision Making•2016

  • Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition

    Open Access•Jonathan St B T Evans, Keith E Stanovich•Perspectives on Psychological…•2013

  • On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability

    Keith E Stanovich, Richard F West•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making

    Open Access•Shane Frederick•The Journal of Economic…•2005

Unique citing works18
Citations per year3
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae