A culture of digital planning? An international comparison of culture, planning and technology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21691980 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ruth Potts (0000-0002-8681-4309, Cardiff University, corresponding author), Dan Milz (0000-0002-8108-7800, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 327-341 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Planning Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1356-3475 • E-ISSN: 1469-9265 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13563475.2024.2407166 |
| OpenAlex | W4402939899 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 32 |
Urban planning has become an increasingly digital practice in the last three decades and was accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Discussions around the digitization of planning processes have focused on the platforms planners use, and the barriers to their use. Such literature does not adequately explain the variability in the use of planning-specific technologies among planning authorities with the same resources and time. We explore the degree to which workplace and professional culture influence the use of digital technologies in planning practice in Australia, Great Britain, and the United States of America. To study cultural attitudes, a mixture of interview data from 29 planners and document analysis from professional organizations were used. The study found cultural factors play a role in determining the diffusion of technology in planning practice. Our analysis demonstrates points of convergence and divergence across all three geographies of practice, with stark differences in the way that technology is discussed and espoused, as well as a broader lack of clear principles to guide the profession through digital transitions across scales
Business · Digital culture · Media studies · Political science · Process management · Sociology · Smart Cities and Technologies
Is Planning “Under Attack”? Chronicling the Deregulation of Urban and Environmental Planning in England
Globalization and the emerging culture of planning
Neo-liberal urban planning policies
A hands-on guide to doing content analysis
Culture Change as Identity Regulation
Covid-19 outbreak
Is a New ‘Planning 3.0’ Paradigm Emerging? Exploring the Relationship between Digital Technologies and Planning Theory and Practice
Local planning cultures? What Glasgow, Melbourne and Toronto planners say
Urban planning, public participation and digital technology
Public engagement in local government
The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research
The Evolution and Trajectories of English Spatial Governance
Framing Cultures of Spatial Planning
Smart cities
Between virtue and profession
Requirements for planning-relevant GIS
Revisit the drivers and barriers to e-governance in the mobile age
Variegated capitalism
Opening for business’? Neoliberalism and the cultural politics of modernising planning in Scotland
Bottlenecks Blocking Widespread Usage of Planning Support Systems
The Embeddedness of Planning in Cultural Contexts
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |