Constructional competition and network reconfiguration
Investigating sum(e) in Old, Middle and Early Modern English
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21695368 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lotte Sommerer (0000-0001-5170-5308, University of Vienna), Klaus Hofmann (0000-0002-6675-0221, University of Vienna) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-33 |
| Publication date | 2021-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | English Language and Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1360-6743 • E-ISSN: 1469-4379 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s136067431900039x |
| OpenAlex | W3004683693 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 42 |
This article investigates some functions of the determinative sum(e) in Old, Middle and Early Modern English. It traces, quantifies and models the diachronic development of sum(e) as a pre-head element from a usage-based, cognitive Construction Grammar perspective by postulating several semi-specified but also abstract constructional OE and ME NP-schemas and sketching the observable (changing) network (re)configurations. By analyzing texts from the Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME) and the Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME), the article especially focuses on the demise of the so-called ‘individualizing’ usage with singular nouns and traces the incipient stages of sum(e) as an indefinite near-article with plural and mass nouns. R was used to calculate correlation coefficients and measures of statistical significance in univariate analyses, and for multivariate regression models to address questions involving more than one predictor variable. It is shown that the usage of sum(e) with singular nouns became marginalized because of constructional competition with the numeral ān . In Old English, the two forms were both occasionally used to mark indefiniteness before singular nouns, but ultimately ān became the default marker of indefiniteness ousting sum(e) . We also show that that the usage of sum(e) as an indefiniteness marker for plural nouns increased drastically from the later ME period onwards, particularly in informal text genres. Moreover, from the earliest periods onwards, there is a strong preference for this function to occur with complex NPs with pre- and post-head modification, which seem to have acted as bridging contexts
Adverbial · Construction Grammar · Determinative · Early Modern English · Linguistics · Middle English · Noun · Numeral system · Old English · Plural · Computer Science · History · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence
The articles
Constructionalization and Constructional Changes
Cognitive Grammar
The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar
Analyzing Linguistic Data
Language, Usage and Cognition
Cognitive Linguistics
How to do Linguistics with R
Constructional Change in English
Phonology and Language Use
The Grammar Network
Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars
Longman grammar of spoken and written English
A Comprehensive grammar of the English language
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
Morphosyntactic Change
Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language
Old English Syntax
Article Emergence in Old English
Sprache der Nähe — Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte
From Preposition to Article
Explain Me This
Some and the Pragmatics of Indefinite Construal
Variation, change and constructions in English
Radical Construction Grammar
| Citations per year | 0.8 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |