Exploring and assessing issue communication – issue communication practices and consequences of issue response strategies for organizational reputation and legitimacy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21696041 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sandra Jacobs (0000-0002-7547-1339, University of Amsterdam, corresponding author), Christine Liebrecht (0000-0002-6621-2212, Tilburg University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 258-273 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Communication Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1363-254X • E-ISSN: 1478-0852 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jcom-11-2023-0127 |
| OpenAlex | W4403431434 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 34 |
Purpose Although issue management has received ample attention, changes in the media landscape and increased societal scrutiny are currently challenging organizations’ communicative handling of issues. This raises the question of how communication professionals currently perceive and communicatively deal with issues, and what impact issue response strategies have when organizations are addressed regarding their involvement in an issue. Design/methodology/approach We explore issue communication perceptions and practices by communication professionals in two focus groups. A subsequent experimental study assesses the consequences of issue response strategies for corporate reputation and legitimacy and examines to what extent this relationship can be explained by skepticism while taking issue phase into account. Findings Although most issue communication practices (still) resemble earlier descriptions, the focus groups also indicate the importance of timing and medium of issue communication. The experiment shows that organizations are better off responding to an issue than not responding at all. Organizations should choose for an accommodative or adaptive response to positively impact reputation and legitimacy, and should be aware of the phase of an issue. Remarkably, these empirical differences only apply for a sustainability issue, not for a social issue. Originality/value The focus group study illuminates current issue monitoring and communication practices in today’s challenging media and societal landscape. The subsequent experiment enhances our understanding of a sub-field of issue communication: the communicative options of organizations when they are the addressed actor in issues
Business · Legitimacy · Organizational communication · Political science · Public relations · Reputation · Reputation management · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Media and Politics
When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism
The Reputation QuotientSM
Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis
Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research
Managing Legitimacy
A revised digital media–arena framework guiding strategic communication in digital environments
No End in Sight? A Greenwash Review and Research Agenda
Reflective Communication Management, Future Ways for Public Relations Research
How Dropping Subjects Who Failed Manipulation Checks Can Bias Your Results
Debating Glyphosate
The Re-mediation of Legacy and New Media on Twitter
A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects who Fail a Manipulation Check
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |