Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exploring and assessing issue communication – issue communication practices and consequences of issue response strategies for organizational reputation and legitimacy

Bibliographic Data

ID21696041
AuthorsSandra Jacobs (0000-0002-7547-1339, University of Amsterdam, corresponding author), Christine Liebrecht (0000-0002-6621-2212, Tilburg University)
Year2025
Volume29
Issue2
Pages258-273
Publication date2025-05-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Communication Management (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1363-254X • E-ISSN: 1478-0852
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/jcom-11-2023-0127
OpenAlexW4403431434
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited34

Purpose Although issue management has received ample attention, changes in the media landscape and increased societal scrutiny are currently challenging organizations’ communicative handling of issues. This raises the question of how communication professionals currently perceive and communicatively deal with issues, and what impact issue response strategies have when organizations are addressed regarding their involvement in an issue. Design/methodology/approach We explore issue communication perceptions and practices by communication professionals in two focus groups. A subsequent experimental study assesses the consequences of issue response strategies for corporate reputation and legitimacy and examines to what extent this relationship can be explained by skepticism while taking issue phase into account. Findings Although most issue communication practices (still) resemble earlier descriptions, the focus groups also indicate the importance of timing and medium of issue communication. The experiment shows that organizations are better off responding to an issue than not responding at all. Organizations should choose for an accommodative or adaptive response to positively impact reputation and legitimacy, and should be aware of the phase of an issue. Remarkably, these empirical differences only apply for a sustainability issue, not for a social issue. Originality/value The focus group study illuminates current issue monitoring and communication practices in today’s challenging media and societal landscape. The subsequent experiment enhances our understanding of a sub-field of issue communication: the communicative options of organizations when they are the addressed actor in issues

Business · Legitimacy · Organizational communication · Political science · Public relations · Reputation · Reputation management · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Media and Politics

  • Language matters

    Open Access•Wouter Jong, Guusje Jol et al.•Acta Psychologica•2026

  • When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism

    Dionysis Skarmeas, Constantinos N Leonidou•Journal of Business Research•2013

  • The Reputation QuotientSM

    Open Access•Charles J Fombrun, Naomi A Gardberg et al.•Journal of Brand Management•2000

  • Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis

    Open Access•W Timothy Coombs•Corporate Reputation Review•2007

  • Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

    Open Access•Shuili Du, C B Bhattacharya et al.•International Journal of…•2010

  • Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research

    Open Access•Dennis A Gioia, Kevin G Corley et al.•Organizational Research Methods•2013

  • Managing Legitimacy

    Mark C Suchman•Academy of Management Review•1995

  • A revised digital media–arena framework guiding strategic communication in digital environments

    Open Access•Mark Badham, Vilma Luoma‐aho et al.•Journal of Communication Management•2024

  • No End in Sight? A Greenwash Review and Research Agenda

    Open Access•A Wren Montgomery, Thomas P Lyons et al.•Organization & Environment•2024

  • Reflective Communication Management, Future Ways for Public Relations Research

    Betteke Van Ruler, Dejan Verčič•Annals of the International…•2005

  • How Dropping Subjects Who Failed Manipulation Checks Can Bias Your Results

    Open Access•Simon Varaine•Journal of Experimental Political…•2022

  • Debating Glyphosate

    Open Access•Irina Lock•International Journal of…•2020

  • The Re-mediation of Legacy and New Media on Twitter

    Open Access•Mike Farjam, Anamaria Dutceac Segesten•Social Science Computer Review•2024

  • A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects who Fail a Manipulation Check

    Open Access•Peter M Aronow, Jonathon Baron et al.•Political Analysis•2019

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae