Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Formal versus informal supervisor socio‐emotional support behaviours and employee trust

The role of cultural power distance

Bibliographic Data

ID21698068
AuthorsJaee Cho (0000-0001-5866-8845, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Kowloon Hong Kong, corresponding author), S Arzu Wasti (0000-0001-7809-5925, Sabanci University Istanbul Turkey), Krishna Savani (0000-0002-6934-1917, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Kowloon Hong Kong), Hwee Hoon Tan (0000-0002-9841-6447, Singapore Management University Singapore City Singapore), Michael W Morris (0000-0002-2224-2495, Columbia University New York New York USA)
Year2024
Volume27
Issue2
Pages203-218
Publication date2024-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Journal Of Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1367-2223 • E-ISSN: 1467-839X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ajsp.12590
OpenAlexW4389228881
LanguageEN
References cited92

This research investigates how formal versus informal supervisor support behaviours shape employees' affect‐ and cognition‐based trust across cultures of varying power distance. Using data from in‐depth interviews, Study 1 found that trust‐enhancing supervisor behaviours were more formal, status conscious and imposing in India (a high power distance culture) than in the Netherlands (a low power distance culture); unlike in India, supervisors acted more like friends or equals with their subordinates in the Netherlands. Using vignettes, Study 2 found that, compared to informal support behaviours, formal support behaviours increased both affect‐ and cognition‐based trust among Indian participants, but among US participants, formal support behaviours only increased cognition‐based trust. Study 3 conceptually replicated those findings by manipulating power distance in an organization. Together, the findings from these three studies suggest that supervisors' formal socio‐emotional support behaviours are particularly effective in increasing affect‐based trust in societal and organizational cultures that are high power distance

Cognition · Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory · Management · Supervisor · Cultural Differences and Values · Emotional Labor in Professions · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Trust in leadership

    Kurt T Dirks, Donald L Ferrin•Journal of Applied Psychology•2002

  • Individual Power Distance Orientation and Follower Reactions to Transformational Leaders

    Bradley L Kirkman, Gilad Chen et al.•Academy of Management Journal•2009

  • From Ideal to Real

    Olga Epitropaki, Robin Martins•Journal of Applied Psychology•2005

  • Toward a Further Understanding of the Relationships Between Perceptions of Support and Work Attitudes

    Open Access•Thomas W H Ng, Kelly L Sorensen•Group & Organization Management•2008

  • Using Mechanical Turk to Study Clinical Populations

    Open Access•Danielle N Shapiro, Joan Chandler et al.•Clinical Psychological Science•2013

  • Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance.

    John M Schaubroeck, John Schaubroeck et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2011

  • Managerial Leadership

    Open Access•Gary Yukl•Journal of Management•1989

  • Unfolding the Proactive Process for Creativity

    Open Access•Yaping Gong, Siu Yin Cheung et al.•Journal of Management•2012

  • Modeling How to Grow

    Bradley P Owens, David R Hekman•Academy of Management Journal•2012

  • Long- versus short-term orientation

    Geert Hofstede, Michael Minkov•Asia Pacific Business Review•2010

  • Affective Trust in Chinese Leaders

    Open Access•Xiao-Ping Chen, Xiaoping Chen et al.•Journal of Management•2014

  • The four elementary forms of sociality

    Alan Page Fiske•Psychological Review•1992

  • What are the odds? How demographic similarity affects the prevalence of perceived employment discrimination.

    Derek R Avery, Patrick F Mckay et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2008

  • Trust and team performance

    Bart De Jong, Kurt T Dirks et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2016

  • Leader humility and team creativity

    Jia Hu, Barış Erdoğan et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2018

  • On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness.

    Michele J Gelfand, Lisa H Nishii et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2006

  • Value from hedonic experience and engagement.

    E Tory Higgins•Psychological Review•2006

  • A test of leadership categorization theory

    Open Access•Robert G Lord, Roseanne J Foti et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1984

  • Collaborating across cultures

    Open Access•Roy Y J Chua, Michael W Morris et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2012

  • Who are the crowdworkers?

    Open Access•Joel Ro, Joel Ross et al.•CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on…•2010

  • Globe

    Open Access•Peter W Dorfman, Peter Dorfman et al.•Journal of World Business•2012

  • Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures

    Open Access•Michele J Gelfand, Jana L Raver et al.•Science•2011

  • When guiding principles do not guide

    Open Access•Andrey Elster, Michele J Gelfand•Journal of Personality•2021

  • Asian Conceptualizations of Leadership

    Rodrigo Takeuchi, A C Wang et al.•Annual Review of Organizational…•2020

  • Measuring trust in organisational research

    Bill Mcevily, Marco Tortoriello•Journal of Trust Research•2011

  • Personal need for structure as a boundary condition for humor in leadership

    Open Access•Alexander Pundt, Laura Venz•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2016

  • Client–project manager engagements, trust, and loyalty

    Open Access•Sheila Simsarian Webber, Richard J Klimoski•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2004

  • Who takes the lead? A multi‐source diary study on leadership, work engagement, and job performance

    Open Access•Kimberley Breevaart, Arnold B Bakker et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2015

  • Revisiting the trustworthiness–trust relationship

    Open Access•Edward C Tomlinson, Andrew K Schnackenberg et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2020

  • From a Measurement Model to a Dynamic Causal Model Commentary on Schwartz

    Open Access•Toshio Yamagishi•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•2013

  • A cultural mismatch

    Open Access•Nicole M Stephens, Sarah S M Townsend et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2012

  • Culture and Procedural Justice

    Open Access•Joel Brockner, Grant Ackerman et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2001

  • The fluency of social hierarchy

    Emily M Zitek, Emily Zitek et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2012

  • Perceived cultural importance and actual self-importance of values in cultural identification

    Ching Wan, Chi-Yue Chiu et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2007

  • Cultural values and authority relations

    T R Tyler, A Lind et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000

  • The Interaction Order

    Erving Goffman•American Sociological Review•1983

  • The Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology

    Tove Helland Hammer, Marvin D Dunnette•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1978

  • Moments of Hierarchy

    Open Access•Elizabeth Keating•American Anthropologist•2000

  • Formality and Informality in Communicative Events

    Open Access•Judith T Irvine•American Anthropologist•1979

  • The Determinants and Consequences of Workplace Sex and Race Composition

    Barbara F Reskin, Debra Branch Mcbrier et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•1999

  • Culture in Interaction

    Nina Eliasoph, Paul Lichterman•American Journal of Sociology•2003

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae