Er is nog steeds geen partikelwoordenboek, hoewel echter het partikelonderzoek niet stilligt
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21701115 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ton van der Wouden (0000-0001-9616-9078, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 241-253 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Nederlandse taalkunde (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1384-5845 • E-ISSN: 2352-1171 |
| Publisher | Amsterdam University Press (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.5117/nedtaa2020.2-3.009.vand |
| OpenAlex | W3093872656 |
| Language | NL |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
There is still no dictionary of particles, although particle research is on-going This paper seeks to explain why there is (still) no comprehensive descriptive work of the particles of Dutch. It does so by focusing on a number of particles that appear to go against common wisdom concerning Dutch sentence structure, in particular V2-violations and wide scope particles that are deeply embedded in complex phrases
Linguistics · Sentence · Theology · Computer Science · Lexicography and Language Studies · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Topic Modeling
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |