Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Benefiting from Wrongdoing and Moral Protest

Bibliographic Data

ID21701628
AuthorsSigurd Lindstad (University of Oslo, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume24
Issue3
Pages753-765
Publication date2021-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthical Theory and Moral Practice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1386-2820 • E-ISSN: 1572-8447
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10677-021-10194-4
OpenAlexW3163609215
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited21

Some normative theorists believe that there is a principled moral reason not to retain benefits realized by injustice or wrongdoing. However, critics have argued that this idea is implausible. One purported problem is that the idea lacks an obvious rationale and that attempts to provide one have been unconvincing. This paper articulates and defends the idea that the principled reason in question has an expressive quality: it gets its reason-giving force from the symbolic aptness of such an act as an expressive response to wrongdoing. The paper thus argues that at least in a certain subset of cases, renouncing benefits realized by injustice amounts to a powerful and uniquely apt expression of protest against the disrespect for the victim that is implied by the wrongdoer’s actions. The paper shows how this idea can inform the question of reparations for slavery and its aftermath in the United States. Lastly it develops an important objection to the argument presented and gives an account of how this objection can be met

Epistemology · Injustice · Law and economics · Normative · Ontology · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Wrongdoing · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy

  • If you polluted, you’re included

    David Matias Paaske, Jakob Thrane Mainz•Critical Review of International…•2023

  • Moral Repair

    Open Access•Margaret Urban Walker•Moral Repair•2006

  • A Companion to Applied Philosophy

    Michel Petheram•Reference Reviews•2018

  • Power and Equality

    Daniel Viehoff•Oxford Studies in Political…•2019

  • Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy

    Steven Wall•Oxford Studies in Political…•2025

  • Beneficiary Pays and Respect for Autonomy

    Sigurd Lindstad•Social Theory and Practice•2021

  • The Morality of Reparation

    Bernard R Boxill•Social Theory and Practice•1972

  • Benefiting from Injustice and Brute Luck

    Carl Knight•Social Theory and Practice•2013

  • Give it up for climate change

    Open Access•Edward A Page•International Theory•2012

  • What is the Wrong in Retaining Benefits from Wrongdoing? How Recent Attempts to Formulate a Plausible Rationale for the ‘Beneficiary Pays Principle’ Have Failed

    Open Access•Sigurd Lindstad•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2019

  • Moral Dimensions

    T M Scanlon, Thomas Scanlon•Moral Dimensions•2008

  • Benefiting from Injustice and the Common-Source Problem

    Open Access•Göran Duus‐otterström•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2017

  • Should the beneficiaries pay

    Open Access•Robert Huseby•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2013

  • Disgorging the Fruits of Historical Wrongdoing

    Open Access•Robert E Goodin•American Political Science Review•2013

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae