Impactful Conceptual Engineering
Designing Technological Artefacts Ethically
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21701766 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Herman Veluwenkamp (0000-0003-1783-459X, University of Groningen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 155-170 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1386-2820 • E-ISSN: 1572-8447 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10677-024-10459-8 |
| OpenAlex | W4401485352 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 57 |
Conceptual engineering is the design, evaluation and implementation of concepts. Despite its popularity, some have argued that the methodology is not worthwhile, because the implementation of new concepts is both inscrutable and beyond our control. In the recent literature we see different responses to this worry. Some have argued that it is for political reasons just as well that implementation is such a difficult task, while others have challenged the metasemantic and social assumptions that underlie this skepticism about implementation. In this paper, I argue that even if implementation is as difficult as critics maintain, there is at least one context in which conceptual engineering is extremely impactful and demonstrably so: the design of new technology. Different conceptions of control, freedom, trust, etc. lead to different designs and implementations of systems that are built to embed those concepts. This means that if we want to design for control, freedom, trust, etc., we have to decide which conception we ought to use. When we determine what the appropriate conception of a concept is in a technological context and use this conception to operationalize a norm or value, we generate requirements which have real-world effects. This not only shows that conceptual engineering can be extremely impactful, the fact that it leads to different design requirements means that we have a way to evaluate our conceptual choices and that we can use this feedback loop to improve upon our conceptual work By illustrating the direct impacts of different conceptions on technology design, this paper underscores the practical applicability and value of conceptual engineering, demonstrating how it serves as a crucial bridge between abstract philosophical analysis and concrete technological innovation
Conceptual design · Conceptual framework · Epistemology · Human–computer interaction · Knowledge management · Management science · Operationalization · Popularity · Skepticism · Computer Science · Engineering · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Socially Disruptive Technologies and Conceptual Engineering
The distinction between generic and specific concepts and why it matters for conceptual engineering
Disruptive technologies, engineered concepts, and normative guidance
Do chatbots change how we think about sexuality? towards an empirically informed philosophy of sexuality in the age of AI-mediated intimacy
Conceptual ethics and the ethics of implementation
Responsibility and Control
Value Sensitive Design
Fixing Language
Conceptual Engineering, Metasemantic Externalism and Speaker-Meaning
A Pragmatic Method for Normative Conceptual Work
Naming and Necessity
Nicomachean Ethics
The meaning of ‘meaning’
The responsibility gap
Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems
Embedding Values in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems
Killer Robots
On the Morality of Artificial Agents
Which Concepts Should We Use?
The revisionist's rubric
Epistemic Paternalism via Conceptual Engineering
Reasons for Meaningful Human Control
Design for values and conceptual engineering
Conceptual Engineering and the Politics of Implementation
There is no dilemma for conceptual engineering. Reply to Max Deutsch
Speaker’s reference, stipulation, and a dilemma for conceptual engineers
Still the same dilemma for conceptual engineers
How should we think about linguistic function
A new challenge to conceptual engineering
Conceptual engineering, speaker-meaning and philosophy
Concepts and conceptual engineering
Engineering concepts by engineering social norms
What is conceptual engineering and what should it be
Conceptual engineering and the implementation problem
Privacy in Context
The story of socio‐technical design
How Do Technological Artefacts Embody Moral Values
Technology as Driver for Morally Motivated Conceptual Engineering
What are socially disruptive technologies
The good, the bad and the insignificant—assessing concept functions for conceptual engineering
Engineering what? On concepts in conceptual engineering
Commitment engineering
Individualism and the Mental
Ontology and Social Construction
Resisting Reality
Is Technology Value-Neutral
Conceptual engineering
| Citations per year | 2.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |